A sock puppet among us?

[John Mytton]

Here's a small sample from the Roger/Martin saga!









JohnM

[John Mytton]

And there is "John" or should I say Lance?

Btw John Mytton, who wasn't even Australian, died in 1834. Are you communicating with us from the after life?

This is hilarious, I was "staying out of it" because I was asleep, I'm Australian!

Yes, so you claim, but when I checked (remember that?) there was no John Mytton registered in the greater Sydney area!

And this Ladies and Gentlemen is why I use a fake name, these loony potentially violent CT's first google you, then track down your address and then they start harassing you at home! I know because it already happened to me!

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Here's a small sample from the Roger/Martin saga!









JohnM

And then Johnny tells you he's not obsessed with me! Hilarious!

He is using screen shots of conversations with Roger Collins from 2013, as if it is unusual that two people speak several languages, but he doesn't understand that it's hardly normal for anybody to save screen shots from 12 years ago.

Says it all, really....

[Martin Weidmann]

And this Ladies and Gentlemen is why I use a fake name, these loony potentially violent CT's first google you, then track down your address and then they start harassing you at home! I know because it already happened to me!

JohnM

If I wanted to track down your real address, I would already have done it. You don't know who you are dealing with but you are simply just not important enough!

But thank you for confirming, once again, that you are using a fake name.

Now the only question that remains to be answered is; when you are using a fake name on this forum, why do you obsess about others using fake names, even if they don't?

[Lance Payette]

This is actually becoming kind of a fun exercise in legal forensics.

I pulled these insults just from "Martin's" posts in April. NONE OF THESE WERE AIMED AT ME but at other targets. Several of them were used repeatedly:

"Delusional, one sick puppy, completely ignorant, your massive ego, your idiotic rant, ego-driven desperation, ignorant arrogance, stupid, pathetic, one of the most insignificant posters."

Nice.

When "Tom's" association with "Martin" was questioned, he responded "Another LN false claim. Your paranoid theories are actually great fun to read; carry on!"

Paranoid theories? Distinctly Martin-like, no?

I don't happen to have the software that will do it, but if anyone does I encourage you to run 25 of "Tom's" posts and 25 of "Martin's" through it. I guarantee you, the software will respond: "Why are you feeding me these softballs? Why are you feeding me 50 posts that are obviously by the same person? I'm better than this, pal. Give me a challenge, will ya?"

Skim their posts for yourself, if you have sufficient interest. THERE IS NO DOUBT.

Oh, BTW, they both "just happen" to have visceral, over-the-top disdain for The Donald and his MAGA supporters. Plenty of people do, of course, but this is just one more link in the chain.

John's point occurred to me as well (and I've never even been to Australia!): Why not just sheepishly laugh this off, "Martin"?

"Yeah, OK, you caught me with my pants down. So what? Sock puppets aren't expressly prohibited here. If I want to be 'Tom' as well as 'Martin," or put on lipstick and a tutu and be 'Gladys' on alternate Tuesdays, what's it to the rest of you?"

But noooo, self-important, oh-so-serious "Martin" has to play this out, attempting to turn the tables that Lance is John, John is somehow a fraud because he uses an historical figure's name, and Lance's little joke about his wife is some dark admission of something.

Get help, "Martin."
Try to show him how absurd this all looks, "Tom."
Give him a big hug and tell him it's OK, "Gladys."

Really, Martin, it's OK. We're all laughing with you, not at you. Well, OK, we ARE laughing at you, but we'd be laughing with you if you'd just fess up and stop perpetuating the nonsense. I truly don't understand your motivation, but I'll let it go.

[Lance Payette]

You don't know who you are dealing with ...

YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN! 

Sorry, couldn't resist.

[Martin Weidmann]

This is actually becoming kind of a fun exercise in legal forensics.

I pulled these insults just from "Martin's" posts in April. NONE OF THESE WERE AIMED AT ME but at other targets. Several of them were used repeatedly:

"Delusional, one sick puppy, completely ignorant, your massive ego, your idiotic rant, ego-driven desperation, ignorant arrogance, stupid, pathetic, one of the most insignificant posters."

Nice.

When "Tom's" association with "Martin" was questioned, he responded "Another LN false claim. Your paranoid theories are actually great fun to read; carry on!"

Paranoid theories? Distinctly Martin-like, no?

I don't happen to have the software that will do it, but if anyone does I encourage you to run 25 of "Tom's" posts and 25 of "Martin's" through it. I guarantee you, the software will respond: "Why are you feeding me these softballs? Why are you feeding me 50 posts that are obviously by the same person? I'm better than this, pal. Give me a challenge, will ya?"

Skim their posts for yourself, if you have sufficient interest. THERE IS NO DOUBT.

Oh, BTW, they both "just happen" to have visceral, over-the-top disdain for The Donald and his MAGA supporters. Plenty of people do, of course, but this is just one more link in the chain.

John's point occurred to me as well (and I've never even been to Australia!): Why not just sheepishly laugh this off, "Martin"?

"Yeah, OK, you caught me with my pants down. So what? Sock puppets aren't expressly prohibited here. If I want to be 'Tom' as well as 'Martin," or put on lipstick and a tutu and be 'Gladys' on alternate Tuesdays, what's it to the rest of you?"

But noooo, self-important, oh-so-serious "Martin" has to play this out, attempting to turn the tables that Lance is John, John is somehow a fraud because he uses an historical figure's name, and Lance's little joke about his wife is some dark admission of something.

Get help, "Martin."
Try to show him how absurd this all looks, "Tom."
Give him a big hug and tell him it's OK, "Gladys."

Really, Martin, it's OK. We're all laughing with you, not at you. Well, OK, we ARE laughing at you, but we'd be laughing with you if you'd just fess up and stop perpetuating the nonsense. I truly don't understand your motivation, but I'll let it go.

When "John Mytton" jumped in, because you were making a fool of yourself, didn't you figure it would be better to stay out of this conversation?

John's point occurred to me as well (and I've never even been to Australia!): Why not just sheepishly laugh this off, "Martin"?

But I do. Just a matter of interest; why did you feel the need to mention that you have never been to Australia? Did you want to create distance between you and your alter ego?

[Martin Weidmann]

YOU CAN SAY THAT AGAIN! 

Sorry, couldn't resist.

So, I've got you mystified, but you still feel you know, right?

I haven't had this much fun for months.... It's absolutely hilarious!