Why did Oswald go to the movies?

[John Iacoletti]

Please point out where I insulted you.
>>> Don't worry, I'm used to it

Just as I thought -- you can't.

What "state of mind" do you propose would cause crime scene investigators not to notice a large object out in the open in the middle of a crime scene?
>>> This has been covered, both in other threads regarding the gun bag, and IB science.

No, it never was.  You invoked "inattentional blindness" but didn't explain why or how it applied to law enforcement officers examining a crime scene, or a guy taking photographs right there in the crime scene.

The Long Brown Bag

...and another cut-and-paste from McAdams.

But McAdams doesn't address the twelve people that Tony has demonstrated were first on the scene and saw no bag.  Nor does he even explain why leaving after the rifle was found precludes someone from seeing a bag in the SN before the rifle was found.

[Howard Gee]

Notice that the troll doesn't dispute any of these things...

For the record, I will non belligerently and without juvenile insults dispute that I'm a coward who lives in his mom's basement.

Now can we get back on with the productive conversation in which you convince the forum that Brewer didn't have a valid reason to suspect Saint Patsy of anything ?

Here, let me help you....

Looked 'funny', LOL

Looked 'scared', LOL

More of this incisive analysis and productive conversation, please.

You're doing a fine job of representing Saint Patsy !

[John Iacoletti]

Now can we get back on with the productive conversation in which you convince the forum that Brewer didn't have a valid reason to suspect Saint Patsy of anything ?

Here, let me help you....

Looked 'funny', LOL

Looked 'scared', LOL

More of this incisive analysis and productive conversation, please.

Is there supposed to be a valid reason to suspect somebody of murder somewhere in that wall of nonsense?

[Howard Gee]

Is there supposed to be a valid reason to suspect somebody of murder somewhere in that wall of nonsense?

Glad you asked that.

Yes, there is.

You see, the cops were searching for a suspect in the murder of another officer.

You do understand that, right ?

Now counselor, if someone looked scared while the cops were passing by, what should Brewer's reaction be ?

Should he think 'Looked scared, LOL' and just go back to managing his shoe store ?

Or did Brewer act prudently and rationally and take justified reasonable action ?

Wall of nonsense, LOL

[John Iacoletti]

You see, the cops were searching for a suspect in the murder of another officer.

You do understand that, right ?

Ok, so far.  But we're talking about Brewer, not "the cops".

Now counselor, if someone looked scared while the cops were passing by, what should Brewer's reaction be ?

I don't know.  Brewer never even explained what "looking scared" meant, given that he was just standing there staring.

But I don't care.  Brewer's not any more required to be rational than you are.  I'm more interested in why the cops considered the man that Postal supposedly described as a murder suspect.  That's their job, not Brewer's.

But if you have a rational reason for why a person staring in a window should be considered a murder suspect, then present it, rather than trying to turn it around like you always do.

[Howard Gee]

Ok, so far.  But we're talking about Brewer, not "the cops".

I don't know.  Brewer never even explained what "looking scared" meant, given that he was just standing there staring.

But I don't care.  Brewer's not any more required to be rational than you are.  I'm more interested in why the cops considered the man that Postal supposedly described as a murder suspect.  That's their job, not Brewer's.

But if you have a rational reason for why a person staring in a window should be considered a murder suspect, then present it, rather than trying to turn it around like you always do.

Not too bright, are you counselor ?

Let's go through it again.

Cops are searching for murder suspect.

Brewer sees man that looks scared and takes action which results in cops being notified that a suspect is probably in the TT.

What part of that sequence is so difficult for you to grasp or accept ?

Sheesh.

[John Iacoletti]

Not too bright, are you counselor ?

And there you go again.  One trick pony.

Let's go through it again.

Cops are searching for murder suspect.

Brewer sees man that looks scared and takes action which results in cops being notified that a suspect is probably in the TT.

What part of that sequence is so difficult for you to grasp or accept ?

Sheesh.

Sheesh, indeed.  What part of that is supposed to explain WHY this person should be considered a murder suspect?  We all know the sequence of events, Howard.

[John Iacoletti]

You can't be this dense.

You don't understand what "why" means, and I'm the one who's dense?

The cops are looking for a murder suspect.

Yes....what does that have to do with Brewer?

Brewer sees a man that looks scared and rightly concludes the man might be a suspect in the murder.

Yes.  WHY?  What did he see that indicated murderer?  And you don't know that it was "rightly", that's just more posturing.

What's so hard to understand ?

What's hard to understand is why you think restating a claim somehow substantiates that claim.  Again, we all know what Brewer (said he) concluded.  The question is why?