You have dragged this on for so long instead of simply asking your question again. Why is that? You seem to be the difficult one.
Ok, I'll give it one more go.
You said 'This fabricated story was created to involve Brewer when the actual evidence shows that he was most likely not involved.'
I asked 'What actual evidence is that?'
Perhaps you could clarify by saying what the fabricated story is, what the true story is, and what the evidence is relating to Brewer's involvement.