You can't be serious.
Why is a shoe salesman's opinion of suspicious behavior better than anyone else's ?
Because the shoe salesman in question was there !
His opinion of whether Saint Patsy was acting suspicious is the ONLY one that matters.
It's hilarious watching an obtuse blowhard wannabe Gerry Spence try to convince the forum jury that Brewer had no reason to suspect Oswald.
Are you trying to convince people Brewer was unjustified or wrong to think your client was acting suspiciously ? Is this an attempt to imply that Brewer shouldn't have taken the actions he did ?
Again, Brewer was there. You weren't.
It doesn't matter that YOU aren't satisfied with his explanation of why he found Saint Patsy suspicious (no explanation would satisfy you anyway). All that matters is he DID find your hero suspicious and took the prudent and swift measures which resulted in your client's apprehension.
Is any of
your sanctimonious hypocrite windbag troll whining supposed to demonstrate that Oswald killed anybody? Of course not.
By the way Goofy, using a forum provided avatar doesn't make one 'cowardly'.
No, it's your behavior that makes you cowardly. You sit there behind your anonymous computer screen and sling abusive juvenile insults from the safety of your mom's basement and derail any productive conversation about the case because that's what trolls do.
