If only we had something to distinguish Oswald from these "other people"? Something that made him different? Something like, I dunno, this?
I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this? So this is nothing. It's not evidence of anything that happened that day. Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him. See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time.

I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this? With a rifle, you mean? In Texas... what do you think?
It's not evidence of anything that happened that day.What day?
If you mean 11/22/63, why don't you explain how a photo taken in march 1963 can be evidence of anything that happened on 11/22/63?
Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him. Really? And here's me thinking the BY photos are most likely authentic. Pffff.. that's what I get from listening way too much to LNs
See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time. You mean calling a witness like Buell Frazier reliable when he says one thing and unreliable when he says another?
Oh wait, my mistake! That's an example of LN dishonesty. Sorry about that
