Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 180805 times)

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #736 on: Today at 06:11:32 AM »
Advertisement
I hear some noise in the background; could that be John Mytton? Wrong bullet, according to Edwin Walker. He was there when the bullet was dug out of the wall.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #736 on: Today at 06:11:32 AM »


Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #737 on: Today at 06:25:13 AM »
I hear some noise in the background; could that be John Mytton? Wrong bullet, according to Edwin Walker. He was there when the bullet was dug out of the wall.

OK, before everyone gets riled up, the bullet penetrated the wall and was found on a "stack of literature."

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #738 on: Today at 07:08:37 AM »
We have arrived at the rabbit hole.  We have the testimony of Oswald's own wife that he practiced with the rifle and that he told her that he did so.  Your rebuttal is that she could be lying despite there being apparent no reason for her to lie about him practicing with the rifle.  It is not a crime to practice firing your rifle.   We have the logical inference that if Oswald ordered a rifle with his limited means and was so excited to get it that he posed for pictures, that he intended to use it.   There is otherwise no explanation for ordering the rifle.

We have arrived at the rabbit hole.

Looks like you already went over the edge.

We have the testimony of Oswald's own wife that he practiced with the rifle and that he told her that he did so.

Strange wording, "his own wife" as opposed to "his wife," which should have sufficed. Doubling down on her claim ("and") doesn't improve her credibility. She's a known liar.

Your rebuttal is that she could be lying despite there being apparent no reason for her to lie about him practicing with the rifle.

I pointed out your incorrect use of "confirm." I didn't speculate about her intend motive. Her claim remains unconfirmed.

It is not a crime to practice firing your rifle.   

Strawman, I didn't claim that.

We have the logical inference that if Oswald ordered a rifle with his limited means and was so excited to get it that he posed for pictures, he intended to use it.

Wrong, we have Richard's flawed inference. What you have at best is intent intend to pose in front of a camera with a rifle.

There is otherwise no explanation for ordering the rifle.

I just told you there is; you fail again.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:09:18 AM by Tom Sorensen »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #738 on: Today at 07:08:37 AM »


Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4536
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #739 on: Today at 07:40:23 AM »
I hear some noise in the background; could that be John Mytton? Wrong bullet, according to Edwin Walker. He was there when the bullet was dug out of the wall.

In his letter to the Attorney General, General Walker saw the bullet on TV during a HSCA broadcast and describes the bullet found at his house as a "hunk of lead" and "baring no resemblance to an unfired bullet in shape of form"



The bullet fragment from the Walker residence has a fair amount of lead showing.




CE 399 would be seen on a low res 1970's television broadcast to appear to be "unfired"



Conclusion

The HSCA showed CE 399 as opposed to the Walker bullet, and from Walker's very own description in the above letter it's clear he saw CE 399.

JohnM
« Last Edit: Today at 10:43:28 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 106
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #740 on: Today at 08:42:29 AM »
Strange, the guys who were there described it as being steel jacketed.
« Last Edit: Today at 08:44:17 AM by Tom Sorensen »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #740 on: Today at 08:42:29 AM »