Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 229467 times)

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #888 on: April 08, 2025, 08:54:51 AM »
Advertisement
Are you 6 foot 3 or 183cm? LOLOLOLO!

JohnM

I am 6'3 ft which is equal to 1,83 meter....

You don't use cm for anything that's higher than a meter. You can't even get that right.... so, when you laugh, you're only laughing about your own stupidity.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #888 on: April 08, 2025, 08:54:51 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #889 on: April 08, 2025, 08:58:15 AM »
There had to be something in the bag?
Just a couple of posts ago you speculated that the reason for Oswald's trip was to fix his marriage and the curtain rods were just a story?
Martin, what's in the bag?



JohnM

I haven't got a clue and neither do you.

All that can be said is that it couldn't have been a broken down MC rifle as that would never fit between Oswald's armpit and cupped hand.

The MC would have had to have been at least 10 cm shorter than it actually is to make it fit.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #890 on: April 08, 2025, 09:00:39 AM »
I am 6'3 ft which is equal to 1,83 meter....

You don't use cm for anything that's higher than a meter. You can't even get that right.... so, when you laugh, you're only laughing about your own stupidity.

You've not only been caught lying, you've proven exactly how dumb you are. Congratulations!



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #890 on: April 08, 2025, 09:00:39 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #891 on: April 08, 2025, 09:04:49 AM »
I haven't got a clue and neither do you.

All that can be said is that it couldn't have been a broken down MC rifle as that would never fit between Oswald's armpit and cupped hand.

The MC would have had to have been at least 10 cm shorter than it actually is to make it fit.

Too bad the bag had Oswald's prints on it! Oops!



And in addition to Frazier saying "I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all.". Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions!
In the following testimony Frazier is referring to the width of the bag but it doesn't change the fact that all of Frazier's assumptions came from a bag that he didn't pay too much attention to the way it was being carried, and also of vital importance is Oswald started his walk to the depository early and ended up 50 feet away and this is very relevant because Oswald always walked with Frazier. What was Oswald trying to hide?

Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I say, like I say now, now I couldn't see much of the bag from him walking in front of me. Now he could have had some of it sticking out in front of his hands because I didn't see it from the front, The only time I did see it was from the back, just a little strip running down from your arm...



JohnM

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #892 on: April 08, 2025, 09:11:37 AM »
You've not only been caught lying, you've proven exactly how dumb you are. Congratulations!



JohnM

Too bad that I have official Government issued documents with the right measurements and do not have to rely on a pathetic internet converter.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #892 on: April 08, 2025, 09:11:37 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #893 on: April 08, 2025, 09:13:35 AM »
Too bad the bag had Oswald's prints on it! Oops!



And in addition to Frazier saying "I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all.". Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions!
In the following testimony Frazier is referring to the width of the bag but it doesn't change the fact that all of Frazier's assumptions came from a bag that he didn't pay too much attention to the way it was being carried, and also of vital importance is Oswald started his walk to the depository early and ended up 50 feet away and this is very relevant because Oswald always walked with Frazier. What was Oswald trying to hide?

Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I say, like I say now, now I couldn't see much of the bag from him walking in front of me. Now he could have had some of it sticking out in front of his hands because I didn't see it from the front, The only time I did see it was from the back, just a little strip running down from your arm...



JohnM

Too bad the bag had Oswald's prints on it! Oops!

No. The claim is that the bag found at the TSBD had Oswald's prints on it.

During his interrogation, on Friday evening, Frazier denied that was the bag he had seen Oswald carry.

Stop making up stuff!

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7807
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #894 on: April 08, 2025, 09:16:58 AM »
Too bad the bag had Oswald's prints on it! Oops!



And in addition to Frazier saying "I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all.". Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions!
In the following testimony Frazier is referring to the width of the bag but it doesn't change the fact that all of Frazier's assumptions came from a bag that he didn't pay too much attention to the way it was being carried, and also of vital importance is Oswald started his walk to the depository early and ended up 50 feet away and this is very relevant because Oswald always walked with Frazier. What was Oswald trying to hide?

Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I say, like I say now, now I couldn't see much of the bag from him walking in front of me. Now he could have had some of it sticking out in front of his hands because I didn't see it from the front, The only time I did see it was from the back, just a little strip running down from your arm...



JohnM

Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions!

Which is clearly incorrect, as he had already seen the package on the backseat of his car and if he had only seen Oswald from the back, he couldn't have seen the package at all.

Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; he did.
Mr. BALL - You say he had the package under his arm when you saw him?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - You mean one end of it under the armpit?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; he had it up just like you stick it right under your arm like that.
Mr. BALL - And he had the lower part--
Mr. FRAZIER - The other part with his right hand.
Mr. BALL - Right hand?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - He carried it then parallel to his body?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right, straight up and down.
Representative FORD - Under his right arm?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.

Stop cherry picking the evidence!

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4725
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #895 on: April 08, 2025, 09:29:56 AM »
Too bad that I have official Government issued documents with the right measurements and do not have to rely on a pathetic internet converter.

Martin, it's just simple math and unlike you, the numbers don't lie.





JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #895 on: April 08, 2025, 09:29:56 AM »