Too bad the bag had Oswald's prints on it! Oops!

And in addition to Frazier saying "I didn't pay too much attention on how he carried the package at all.". Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions!
In the following testimony Frazier is referring to the width of the bag but it doesn't change the fact that all of Frazier's assumptions came from a bag that he didn't pay too much attention to the way it was being carried, and also of vital importance is Oswald started his walk to the depository early and ended up 50 feet away and this is very relevant because Oswald always walked with Frazier. What was Oswald trying to hide?
Mr. FRAZIER - Well, I say, like I say now, now I couldn't see much of the bag from him walking in front of me. Now he could have had some of it sticking out in front of his hands because I didn't see it from the front, The only time I did see it was from the back, just a little strip running down from your arm...

JohnM
Frazier also testified that he only saw the package from the back so obviously made some assumptions! Which is clearly incorrect, as he had already seen the package on the backseat of his car and if he had only seen Oswald from the back, he couldn't have seen the package at all.
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; he did.
Mr. BALL - You say he had the package under his arm when you saw him?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - You mean one end of it under the armpit?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir; he had it up just like you stick it right under your arm like that.
Mr. BALL - And he had the lower part--
Mr. FRAZIER - The other part with his right hand.
Mr. BALL - Right hand?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right.
Mr. BALL - He carried it then parallel to his body?
Mr. FRAZIER - Right, straight up and down.
Representative FORD - Under his right arm?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Stop cherry picking the evidence!