Buell Wesley Frazier

[Ross Lidell]

Maybe it contained his lunch and laundry. After all he regularly collected his laundry after visiting Marina. Yet Buell only remembered Oswald carrying his lunch.....a dual purpose bag....there's an option.

Maybe it contained his lunch and laundry. After all he regularly collected his laundry after visiting Marina.

Marina mentioned nothing about Lee's laundry (on 21/22 November 1963) in her testimony before the Warren Commission. Same goes for the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Yet Buell only remembered Oswald carrying his lunch.....a dual purpose bag....there's an option.

Maybes are not evidence. Options are not evidence.

[Ross Lidell]

Maybes are not evidence. Options are not evidence.

I was engaging in justified speculation ... based on an assessment of Marina Oswald's and Buell Frazier's illogical reasons for believing Lee Oswald was not involved willingly and knowingly in the assassination of President Kennedy.

[Colin Crow]

Maybe it contained his lunch and laundry. After all he regularly collected his laundry after visiting Marina.

Marina mentioned nothing about Lee's laundry (on 21/22 November 1963) in her testimony before the Warren Commission. Same goes for the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Yet Buell only remembered Oswald carrying his lunch.....a dual purpose bag....there's an option.

Maybes are not evidence. Options are not evidence.

Lee used to regularly get his laundry done at the Paine's. Yet Buell only ever noticed his lunch. How else might Oswald have transported his laundry then? Seems logical that he used one bag to contain both lunch and laundry then.

[Martin Weidmann]

Maybe it contained his lunch and laundry. After all he regularly collected his laundry after visiting Marina.

Marina mentioned nothing about Lee's laundry (on 21/22 November 1963) in her testimony before the Warren Commission. Same goes for the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

Yet Buell only remembered Oswald carrying his lunch.....a dual purpose bag....there's an option.

Maybes are not evidence. Options are not evidence.

Absence of a statement in her testimony is not evidence either.

Earlier today I had to testify in a case as a witness. I wanted to tell the court about a particular observation, which I thought was relevant, but I never got to say it.... why? Because they did not ask me!

[Colin Crow]

Frazier acknowledges that Lee always carried his lunch ..but then acts as if he's Superman with X-ray vision and can see that the paper sack doesn't hold Lee's lunch....incredible!! 

Buell Frazier estimated the package--that Oswald carried into the TSBD--was 2 feet give or take a few inches. That means a package 21 to 27 inches long. That's a long package to contain lunch.

Tell me: What was the lunch? Celery sticks or french bread?

I simply used the available facts to provide you with an option that you requested.

Oswald regularly took his laundry. Oswald regularly took his lunch. Frazier only remembers Oswald carrying his lunch......ergo the bag regularly contained his laundry and lunch.

[Walt Cakebread]

Frazier acknowledges that Lee always carried his lunch ..but then acts as if he's Superman with X-ray vision and can see that the paper sack doesn't hold Lee's lunch....incredible!! 

Buell Frazier estimated the package--that Oswald carried into the TSBD--was 2 feet give or take a few inches. That means a package 21 to 27 inches long. That's a long package to contain lunch.

Tell me: What was the lunch? Celery sticks or french bread?

Tell me: What was the lunch? Celery sticks or french bread?

Nobody could apprise you about anything Mr Lidell.....   Clearly you believe that an object in a paper sack must fill the dimensions of the sack.   Clearly you are too obtuse to understand that a two foot long sack can be used to carry a sandwich and an orange or apple.....

[Ray Mitcham]

Tell me: What was the lunch? Celery sticks or french bread?

Nobody could apprise you about anything Mr Lidell.....   Clearly you believe that an object in a paper sack must fill the dimensions of the sack.   Clearly you are too obtuse to understand that a two foot long sack can be used to carry a sandwich and an orange or apple.....

Or a broken down rifle. Oh wait.........

[Walt Cakebread]

Or a broken down rifle. Oh wait.........

A 35 inch long rifle stock in a 27 inch sack??.....  How's that possible?