Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 159321 times)

Online Tom Sorensen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #400 on: Today at 08:38:43 AM »
Advertisement
At least!

And yet STILL no one can say!

How about you, Tom?

Oodles and gobs, right?

Say what?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #400 on: Today at 08:38:43 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #401 on: Today at 08:46:58 AM »
Say what?

Is English your second language?

Online Tom Sorensen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #402 on: Today at 09:47:11 AM »
Is English your second language?

Correct. You needed something from me?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #402 on: Today at 09:47:11 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #403 on: Today at 09:53:52 AM »
Correct. You needed something from me?

Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

Online Tom Sorensen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #404 on: Today at 11:44:47 AM »
Yes -- I could use a good laugh!

Regarding the assassination of President John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas, Texas, on November 22nd, 1963, how many bad guys do you think were involved in the planning, the "patsy-ing," the shooting, and the cover up?

Lots and lots?

The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #404 on: Today at 11:44:47 AM »


Online Tom Mahon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #405 on: Today at 07:30:10 PM »
The Warren report itself, consisting of 888 pages of lies and deception, is the best evidence of a cover-up pinning the murder on Oswald. If Oswald acted alone all along, there would be no need for a cover-up, so we know a conspiracy at some level was real. This is basic stuff.

Seven WC members signed off on the report, plus assistant counsel to the commissions, who were instrumental in putting together the report. LBJ formed the commission to block out any other investigation (he saw Hoover was in panic mode), so I'd say easily 20 in the government cover-up department.

I don't know about the planning and patsy part of the deal. What I can say is that both Frazier and Oswald were planted at the TSBD, as Truly didn't need staff at the time they were hired. I couldn't say if Truly was simply told by management to hire them or if he was part of the setup; Shelley would evidently have known that hiring the two rookies was nuts. At least somebody at this level connected to the TSBD was pulling strings to place Frazier and Oswald there.

It sounds as though you've been fully indoctrinated.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #405 on: Today at 07:30:10 PM »