Buell Wesley Frazier

[Martin Weidmann]

He's been doing it for 60+ pages

And many years   

[Michael Capasse]

I'll ask again. 3rd time:

He didn't pay attention to the bag, but what exactly was Frazier's mistake?

[John Mytton]

He's been doing it for 60+ pages

I present fact after fact after fact, whereas ALL the CT's just keep running from my basic fundamental question!
All I ask is what happened to Oswald's "curtain rods" and clearly they were very important to him, especially after making a unique mid-week trip to Irving, so why Michael, why didn't Oswald take his "curtain rods" back to his room on Beckley?
And all I hear is crickets! Chirp chirp chirp!

JohnM

[Michael Capasse]

The bag was a perfect fit for Oswald's rifle. JohnM

Frazier saw a bag from the palm to his armpit - Too short to be the rifle

The bag was recovered in the sniper's nest and Oswald's rifle was discovered on the very same floor.

JohnM

The first 11 officers never saw the bag on the floor when they arrived - The first 4 testified as such:

Sgt. Gerald Hill, the first DPD officer to arrive:
"The only specifics we discussed were this. You were asking Officer Hicks if either one recalled seeing a sack,
supposedly one that had been made by the suspect, in which he could have possibly carried the weapon into the Depository,
and I at that time told you about the small sack that appeared to be a lunch sack, and that that was the only sack that I saw,
and that I left the Book Depository prior to the finding of the gun."

Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney
Mr. BALL. Did you see a paper bag at any other window?
Mr. MOONEY. No, sir; I didn't.

Mr. BALL. .....Now, was there anything you saw over in the corner?
Mr. MOONEY. No, sir; I didn't see anything over in the corner.

Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig:
Mr. BELIN. Was there any long sack laying in the floor there that you remember seeing, or not?
Mr. CRAIG. No; I don't remember seeing any.

Detective Boyd, who arrived with Captain Fritz before Day and Studebaker:
Mr. BALL. Did you see any brown wrapping paper near the window where the hulls were found,
near the windows alongside which the hulls were found?

Mr. BOYD. I don't believe I did.

Why do CT's always make themselves the ultimate arbiter and for no reasonable reason, deny each and every piece of presented evidence? Lucky we have impartial Jury's, who make decisions based on the evidence and not their overpowering bias!

Oswald's prints were on the bag, and again, Oswald's prints were on the bag.

JohnM

The fingerprints are not consistent with how Lee or LMR held the bag. One detective called them nothing more than a smudge.
  Try again.

[John Mytton]

I'll ask again. 3rd time:

He didn't pay attention to the bag, but what exactly was Frazier's mistake?

Your question doesn't make sense because you make a statement confirming Frazier's mistake, then ask a question that you yourself just answered!?

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

I present fact after fact after fact, whereas ALL the CT's just keep running from my basic fundamental question!
All I ask is what happened to Oswald's "curtain rods" and clearly they were very important to him, especially after making a unique mid-week trip to Irving, so why Michael, why didn't Oswald take his "curtain rods" back to his room on Beckley?
And all I hear is crickets! Chirp chirp chirp!

JohnM

I present fact after fact after fact,

LOL 

[Michael Capasse]

Your question doesn't make sense because you make a statement confirming Frazier's mistake, then ask a question that you yourself just answered!?

JohnM

It's really very simple, John.
YOU insisted Frazier is mistaken - what exactly is that mistake?

[John Mytton]

Frazier saw a bag from the palm to his armpit - Too short to be the rifle

The first 11 officers never saw the bag on the floor when they arrived - The first 4 testified as such:

Sgt. Gerald Hill, the first DPD officer to arrive:
"The only specifics we discussed were this. You were asking Officer Hicks if either one recalled seeing a sack,
supposedly one that had been made by the suspect, in which he could have possibly carried the weapon into the Depository,
and I at that time told you about the small sack that appeared to be a lunch sack, and that that was the only sack that I saw,
and that I left the Book Depository prior to the finding of the gun."

Deputy Sheriff Luke Mooney
Mr. BALL. Did you see a paper bag at any other window?
Mr. MOONEY. No, sir; I didn't.

Mr. BALL. .....Now, was there anything you saw over in the corner?
Mr. MOONEY. No, sir; I didn't see anything over in the corner.

Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig:
Mr. BELIN. Was there any long sack laying in the floor there that you remember seeing, or not?
Mr. CRAIG. No; I don't remember seeing any.

Detective Boyd, who arrived with Captain Fritz before Day and Studebaker:
Mr. BALL. Did you see any brown wrapping paper near the window where the hulls were found,
near the windows alongside which the hulls were found?

Mr. BOYD. I don't believe I did.

The fingerprints are not consistent with how Lee or LMR held the bag. One detective called them nothing more than a smudge.
  Try again.

1) You yourself confirmed repeatedly that Frazier didn't pay attention to the bag and he admitted under oath that the bag may have been out in front, sorry but them's the facts.

2) Multiple officers saw Oswald's rifle bag in the corner of the TSBD. “If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound”

3) The time that Linnie or Wesley saw the bag, is a fraction of time Oswald spent making, carrying and unpacking his rifle bag, so your statement is just plain stupid.

This is fun, keep at it though and maybe just maybe you might be able to come up with a worthwhile response!

JohnM