Buell Wesley Frazier

[Michael Capasse]

"Following the assassination all employees were dismissed from work, and I left the building at about 1:15pm."

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Laughable.  A lot of people "worked there" but Oswald was the only employee to leave his prints on the boxes.  So unlucky.  A multitude of different sources link Oswald to the rifle including his prints. No other person has ever been linked to that rifle by ANY evidence.  No other employee left the building and never reported again, got a gun, killed a police officer, and resisted arrest.  At the very least Brennan confirms that a slender, white male fired the shots from the 6th floor window.  That alone debunks many conspiracy theories. Even the most deranged CTer must admit that Brennan's description at least is consistent with Oswald and certainly does not exclude him as the shooter.

If only we had something to distinguish Oswald from these "other people"? Something that made him different? Something like, I dunno, this?

I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this? So this is nothing. It's not evidence of anything that happened that day. Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him. See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time.

[Martin Weidmann]

If only we had something to distinguish Oswald from these "other people"? Something that made him different? Something like, I dunno, this?

I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this? So this is nothing. It's not evidence of anything that happened that day. Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him. See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time.

I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this?

With a rifle, you mean? In Texas... what do you think?

It's not evidence of anything that happened that day.

What day?

If you mean 11/22/63, why don't you explain how a photo taken in march 1963 can be evidence of anything that happened on 11/22/63?

Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him.

Really? And here's me thinking the BY photos are most likely authentic. Pffff.. that's what I get from listening way too much to LNs   

See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time.

You mean calling a witness like Buell Frazier reliable when he says one thing and unreliable when he says another?

Oh wait, my mistake! That's an example of LN dishonesty. Sorry about that 

[Tom Sorensen]

If only we had something to distinguish Oswald from these "other people"? Something that made him different? Something like, I dunno, this?

I guess lots of people have their wives take photos of them like this? So this is nothing. It's not evidence of anything that happened that day. Besides, it's fake anyway. It's both nothing and obviously something made to incriminate him. See, in conspiracy world you have to argue both "A" and "not A" at the same time.

I can't make out the serial number on the rifle, what do you have?

[Richard Smith]

Means nothing. Lee picks books out of boxes. There are also unidentified prints on those boxes. 

Oswald's prints on the rifle are garbage. Found only after Oswald was dead.

Conclusively true, and that includes Oswald.

  Here is a list.

Lee was NOT the only employee to leave the building and not return.
The following employees also did not return to work after the assassination.



Jack Charles Cason – President of School Book Depository – left building at 12:10 p.m. and went home (22H 640)
Gloria Jean Holt clerk at TSBD – does not return after shooting. (19H 526 | 22H 652)
Sharon Simmons Nelson, Secretary, does not return after shooting. (Ibid)

Bonnie Richey, Secretary, does not return after the shooting. (22H 671)
Carolyn Arnold does not return after shooting. (22H 635)
Mrs. Donald Baker, Clerk, does not return after shooting. (22H 635)

Judy Marie Johnson does not return after shooting. (22H 256)
Ms. Stella Mae Jacob does not return after shooting. (22H 665)
Virginia H. Brnum – McGraw-Hill employee, does not return after shooting. (22H 636)

Vida Lee Whately – Clerk, does not return after shooting. (22H 680)
Warren Caster, ate lunch in Denton. (22H 641 | 26H 738)
Spaudlin “Pud” Jones, eating lunch at Blue Front with Herbert. (22H 658)

Herbert L. Junker – McMillian employee, (22H 659)
Mrs. Helen Palmer, Clerk, not present as she was at Love Field. (22H 659)
Franklin Kaiser – absent from work on 11/22/63. (6H 342 | 23H 751)

Charles Givens does not return after the shooting; an APB was issued for him.

The following were absent that day

Vickie Davis, employee, was absent.
Dottie Lovelady, employee, was absent.
Mrs. Rudell Parsons, employee, was absent.

Joe Bergen, Scott Foreman, was absent.
Maury Brown, McGraw-Hill, was absent.
John Langston, was absent.

https://jfk.boards.net/post/587

All subject to further proof.

Did I mention that 3 other people corroborate: more than one person in the window before the president arrived.
Spanish looking men in light colored clothing - a rifle and a man in a brown suit.

That's brutal stupidity.  Your list includes numerous people who were not even in the TSBD that day.  Bueller, Bueller, Bueller.... HA HA HA.  They didn't leave the building because they were apparently never there.  Do you think that is analogous to Oswald's situation who was PRESENT in the TSBD at the moment of the assassination and left within minutes not even pausing to ask what was happening.  Wow.

[Michael Capasse]

That's brutal stupidity.  Your list includes numerous people who were not even in the TSBD that day.  Bueller, Bueller, Bueller.... HA HA HA.  They didn't leave the building because they were apparently never there.  Do you think that is analogous to Oswald's situation who was PRESENT in the TSBD at the moment of the assassination and left within minutes not even pausing to ask what was happening.  Wow.

6 people not there. Wow. 15 people that were.
...and no formal lineup at work:

Mr. BALL. Did you make a check of your employees afterwards?
Mr. TRULY. No, no; not complete. No, I just saw the group of the employees over there on the floor and I noticed this boy wasn’t with them.

[Tom Sorensen]

"Others left the building"? Yes, after they were questioned by the police and told they could leave. Oswald was *the only* person in the building at the time of the shooting who left right afterwards. Without permission. Again, he comes out of the building and shows no interest in all at this chaos going on right outside. In fact, he shows no interest at all at anytime *after* the shooting. Not a bit.

This is another example of "lots of people did that" when it comes to Oswald. As if nothing distinguishes Oswald from these "lots of people." See, Oswald was just like everyone else.

A conspiracy involving Oswald as a participant is plausible. One that has him completely innocent requires absurd arguments and explanations.

Tosspot Time with Galbraith:

Again, he comes out of the building and shows no interest in all at this chaos going on right outside. In fact, he shows no interest at all at anytime *after* the shooting. Not a bit. So why on earth would Galbraith expect Oswald to act normal when he just lectured us about him being an anti-social, commie-defecting nutjob?

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,4188.msg160833.html#msg160833

[Martin Weidmann]

"Others left the building"? Yes, after they were questioned by the police and told they could leave. Oswald was *the only* person in the building at the time of the shooting who left right afterwards. Without permission. Again, he comes out of the building and shows no interest in all at this chaos going on right outside. In fact, he shows no interest at all at anytime *after* the shooting. Not a bit.

This is another example of "lots of people did that" when it comes to Oswald. As if nothing distinguishes Oswald from these "lots of people." See, Oswald was just like everyone else.

A conspiracy involving Oswald as a participant is plausible. One that has him completely innocent requires absurd arguments and explanations.

Oswald was *the only* person in the building at the time of the shooting who left right afterwards. Without permission. Again, he comes out of the building and shows no interest in all at this chaos going on right outside. In fact, he shows no interest at all at anytime *after* the shooting. Not a bit.

What kind of interest do you expect him to show? Not everybody wants to stand front row. Some people just do not want to get involved and walk away after seeing a shooting or an accident.

Besides, Mrs Reid had already told him the President had been shot at and could have been injured. And you don't know if he talked to anybody else who could given him additional information.