Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 206934 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11148
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #824 on: April 03, 2025, 11:09:54 PM »
Advertisement
No place is any safer than the person with the firearm. Showing up at a rifle range on foot with a gun in a blanket would have been interesting and they like to sell the ammo. Love Field would have worked better, but both have their advantages, but you pay at a rifle range.

Love Field is an airport.  Who practices rifle shooting at an airport?

Quote
Yes- Remember he sat on the porch working the rifle bolt and aiming it.

"Remember" what?  It was dark, Marina was inside and she heard noises.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #824 on: April 03, 2025, 11:09:54 PM »


Online Tom Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 758
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #825 on: April 04, 2025, 05:29:11 AM »
Why Oswald instead of anyone else. I am a long way from well-read on Oswald but what I have garnered, is he was really an anti-social individual. How would someone like him possibly get information from any high-ranking person? It is hard to imagine someone with his nature being good at securing information. You have read a great deal more on this Russian subject than anyone I know. Does he really seem like a person who would be good at it? Granted this whole Russian defection seems strange but everything about him is strange.  But that does not make him a spy, just odd.

According to John M. Newman's theory in his 2022 book, "Uncovering Popov's Mole," it wasn't Oswald's task to get information in the USSR, but to stimulate interest in himself (by declaring to the KGB's microphones hidden in Richard Snyder's office that he was going to tell them "something of special interest" pertaining to his work as a Marine radar operator) so that its moles could be ostensibly uncovered in the CIA, and to unwittingly do it in such a way that would ensure that the ensuing mole hunt would be in the wrong part of the Agency -- the Soviet Russia Division -- thereby protecting the mole who had sent him, Bruce Leonard Solie in the mole-hunting Office of Security.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 05:38:54 AM by Tom Graves »

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #826 on: April 04, 2025, 03:43:44 PM »
CE-543 was a dented shell found in the SN.
Did he dry-fire at the president?

https://jfk.boards.net/post/2754/thread

You state CE 543 was dryfired by Oswald, but you then thought it best to throw the rest of the crap thinking into the post?

 Is this an example of what is posted on your website?

 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #826 on: April 04, 2025, 03:43:44 PM »


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #827 on: April 04, 2025, 03:48:09 PM »
The facts still don't care about your opinion.

Certainly not the WC, for obvious reasons.

That would certainly depend on the condition of the scope; what scenario are you assuming since your sudden interest in the scope?

So why bring it to the sixth floor when it wasn't to be trusted?

So not creditable across the board.
 
Good.

If not Oswald, why bring up CE 543? You make no sense.

What is this? Just being clever?

Most importantly, fell flat on your face when it was time to man up and name who “your” shooter was after you have exonerated Oswald in your mind.

 

Offline Michael Capasse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #828 on: April 04, 2025, 03:54:23 PM »
You state CE 543 was dryfired by Oswald, but you then thought it best to throw the rest of the crap thinking into the post?

The only one that said that was YOU:

Not true, CE 543 shell was dryfired in LHO's carcano.

You also claimed that:

Randle said the bag was held with two hands.
There were two sets of chicken bones were found in the SN
US Marines handed out carcanos to familiarize solders with bolt action.

All without any evidence whatsoever.
You're not very good at this.

« Last Edit: April 04, 2025, 04:01:04 PM by Michael Capasse »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #828 on: April 04, 2025, 03:54:23 PM »


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #829 on: April 04, 2025, 04:07:18 PM »
According to John M. Newman's theory in his 2022 book, "Uncovering Popov's Mole," it wasn't Oswald's task to get information in the USSR, but to stimulate interest in himself (by declaring to the KGB's microphones hidden in Richard Snyder's office that he was going to tell them "something of special interest" pertaining to his work as a Marine radar operator) so that its moles could be ostensibly uncovered in the CIA, and to unwittingly do it in such a way that would ensure that the ensuing mole hunt would be in the wrong part of the Agency -- the Soviet Russia Division -- thereby protecting the mole who had sent him, Bruce Leonard Solie in the mole-hunting Office of Security.

Thank you for the summary. The whole thing hinges on LHO and that there really were KGB microphones hidden in Snyder's Office? They knew this or surmised it? It actually sounds like someone was worried about little green men in the bushes. Maybe they are really there.

I would bet in the spy world paranoia this really is how they think.

It does remove LHO from having to have a personality at least in perspective of gathering info in the spy world.

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #830 on: April 04, 2025, 04:52:44 PM »
The only one that said that was YOU:

You also claimed that:

Randle said the bag was held with two hands.
There were two sets of chicken bones were found in the SN
US Marines handed out carcanos to familiarize solders with bolt action.

All without any evidence whatsoever.
You're not very good at this.

The only one that said that was YOU:

You don’t think the FBI’s analysis along with Josiah Thompson’s observations and opinion matter?

If you would put this on your website, one thing on it would be right.
 

You also claimed that:
 
Randle said the bag was held with two hands.

Your right, she did. She totally ruined your little bag expose because you can’t read.
 
There were two sets of chicken bones were found in the SN

How many ways are there to describe one set, with and without bottles and bags, in two locations from how many different witnesses?

Are you thinking Shelley was wrong?

 
US Marines handed out carcanos to familiarize solders with bolt action.

No, that was your Siamese Twin Brother’s thinking. For him it had to be the only way LHO would know how to operate a carcano. Apparently, you think that too.

Have you ever posted anything that is true?


 
All without any evidence whatsoever.

So now FBI reports, Thompson’s observations, and witness statements aren’t evidence.

 
You're not very good at this.


How would you know? I suppose for you though, just wandering around with a found less opinion is way better.

 

Offline Tom Sorensen

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #831 on: April 04, 2025, 06:10:42 PM »
What is this? Just being clever?

Most importantly, fell flat on your face when it was time to man up and name who “your” shooter was after you have exonerated Oswald in your mind.

So you've been dry firing for several pages now, proving you have no actual ammo to support your nutty claims. Except for the only live round you fired into your foot when claiming Marina had as liitle experience with medical information as with rifles; she was a pharmacist. Bye Jack.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #831 on: April 04, 2025, 06:10:42 PM »