Buell Wesley Frazier

[Martin Weidmann]

Maybe he intuited that it was a rifle and he was too embarrassed or felt culpable for not having told Mt. Truly or some other person of authority about it when they got to work.

Yeah right.... and then, for the next 60 years, he keeps repeating the same story. 

 

[Michael Capasse]

Your right Linnie May describes holding it with two hands again:

Randle said: "Oswald gripped the bag in his right hand near the top. "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand." WCR page 133

Gripping the bag and then hugging the bag are two different actions.

The bag then tapers and where he then is hugging it in his other hand.

Just like “and the bottom, he carried it this way,”

Pretty hard to escape Mrs Randle’s testimony. 

Mrs. RANDLE  .....“and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”
Now explain how the bag could only be 27 inches long and LHO carried the bag in this manner.

...in his right hand. It makes no difference 27 in. or more.
There is nothing there about any OTHER hand

[Jack Nessan]

...in his right hand. It makes no difference 27 in. or more.
There is nothing there about any OTHER hand

Unfortunately, you can’t ignore or dismiss this. 

“and the bottom he carried it this way,” or "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand."

You post quotes without understanding what you are quoting? Both are references to holding the bag with the left hand.

You can become as brain dead as you want over the word left but you can't deny what she said.

 

[Michael Capasse]

Unfortunately, you can’t ignore or dismiss this. 

“and the bottom he carried it this way,” or "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand."

Yes I can. And I do.

You post quotes without understanding what you are quoting? Both are references to holding the bag with the left hand.

There is no left hand.

The Commission found that Randle saw Oswald carrying the bag with only his right hand.
Here are 2 more quotes from the WCR that make that clear:

Randle said: "Oswald gripped the bag in his right hand near the top. "It tapered like this as he hugged it in his hand." WCR page 133
"Mrs. Randle saw the bag fleetingly and her first remembrance is that it was held in Oswald's right hand "and it almost touched the ground as he carried it.'' WCR page 134

There was no other hand used or written into the WC findings. You're just making that up.

[Jack Nessan]

Yes I can. And I do.

There is no left hand.

The Commission found that Randle saw Oswald carrying the bag with only his right hand.
Here are 2 more quotes from the WCR that make that clear:

There was no other hand used or written into the WC findings. You're just making that up.

What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

This is a post from you quoting Linnie May.

“and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”


“And the bottom, he carried it this way". The words “AND the bottom” completely defines the statement.

Powerful words, aren’t they? A direct reference to the other hand. One hand cannot hold top and bottom.

You obviously understand their importance or why would you pretend they do not exist and pretend quoting a WC summary is somehow better.?

The same as referring to “gripping the top with his right hand and it tappered ---”hugged” it in his hand. It is the same reference in both quotes.

[Michael Capasse]

What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

This is a post from you quoting Linnie May.

“and he carried it in his right hand, had the top sort of folded down and had a grip like this, and the bottom, he carried it this way, you know, and it almost touched the ground as he carried it”


“And the bottom, he carried it this way". The words “AND the bottom” completely defines the statement.

Powerful words, aren’t they? A direct reference to the other hand. One hand cannot hold top and bottom.

You obviously understand their importance or why would you pretend they do not exist and pretend quoting a WC summary is somehow better.?

The same as referring to “gripping the top with his right hand and it tappered ---”hugged” it in his hand. It is the same reference in both quotes.

I have no need to respond to made up 

[Jack Nessan]

I have no need to respond to made up 

You have repeatedly proven you cannot respond to it. It is impossible to deny.

 Here it is again for you. :"AND the bottom he carried it this way."

Pretend all you want but it does not change what Linnie May stated in her WC testimony.

A bag 27 inches long does not work with LHO walking normally. That is the reality of it.

[Michael Capasse]

What she said is not going away because you want to dismiss and ignore it.

  Sure it will. You're the only one that says it.