Buell Wesley Frazier

[Jack Nessan]

Sure it will. You're the only one that says it.

No, it won't.

You obviously understand it.  Her statement cannot be explained away, or you would have.

[Richard Smith]

I have "blind faith"

Common among MAGA xxxxxxx.

when the person who was present at the event with no apparent reason to lie about an innocuous event

Apparent.

(i.e. he asked Oswald whether he carried his lunch that day and Oswald said no) confirms this happened.

Classic Richard Smith misuse of "confirmed". There is no other account of what took place inside that car.

How exactly could this be proven to your subjective satisfaction absent a time machine? 

It couldn't, even objectively, and you're still struggling to understand this. Wow!

The real knee slapper is that you are relying on this same witness

False, I'm not relying on Frazier.

- who you appear to be suggesting lied about asking if Oswald had his lunch -

False, it may appear so to you for whatever reason.

for his estimate of the length of a bag that he hardly saw. 

I haven't referred to his estimate—DOH.

Riddle me this Batman, if Frazier was willing to lie about Oswald not carrying his lunch - again as you suggest he did -

Again, I haven't suggested that.

then why wouldn't he also confirm the more important fact that the bag was long enough to carry the rifle?

Because the curtain rods would fit the shorter bag, cupped in Oswald's hand, as claimed by Frazier.

HA HA HA. 

Certainly, you failed again.

I know logic and common sense are not among your strong points but this is actually embarrassing.

Knowing how MAGA logic works, I wouldn't be too concerned about your opinion.

Do you accept Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag or not?

[Tom Sorensen]

Do you accept Frazier's estimate of the length of the bag or not?

It's on record and he hasn't caved in, yet. His two independent ways of estimating it make sense. I know it frustrates the heck out of you—LOL.

[John Mytton]

It's on record and he hasn't caved in, yet. His two independent ways of estimating it make sense, in fact, it actually matched a pair of curtain rods in the Paine's garage. I know it frustrates the heck out of you—LOL.

The curtain rods in the Paine garage were 27.5 inches or 698.5 mm and I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm and there is no way I can carry something that long in the way Frazier described. So unless Oswald had gorilla type arms which he didn't, there was no way Oswald would be able to carry 27.5 inch curtain rods between his armpit and his cupped hand!
Try it yourself!





JohnM

[Tom Sorensen]

Right, I should remove that reference from my post.

[Martin Weidmann]

The curtain rods in the Paine garage were 27.5 inches or 698.5 mm and I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm and there is no way I can carry something that long in the way Frazier described. So unless Oswald had gorilla type arms which he didn't, there was no way Oswald would be able to carry 27.5 inch curtain rods between his armpit and his cupped hand!
Try it yourself!





JohnM

I agree. So it wasn't curtain rods. I believe the curtain rods story was just the excuse Oswald used instead of having to tell a 19 years old Buell Frazier about his martial problems.

So, the bag, which didn't contain curtain rods would have to have been smaller (actually about 10 cm) to fit between Oswald's armpit and the cup of his hand.

Which, of course, also rules out a broken down MC rifle being in that bag.


I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm

Really? You are 1,87 meters?

I'm 6'3" and I am only 1,83 meters....

How can you be smaller than me in feet/inches and bigger in meters?

[John Mytton]

I'm 6'2" or 1870 mm

Really? You are 1,87 meters?

I'm 6'3" and I am only 1,83 meters....

How can you be smaller than me in feet/inches and bigger in meters?

 

6'3" = 75 inches = 190.5 cm



JohnM

[John Mytton]

I agree. So it wasn't curtain rods. I believe the curtain rods story was just the excuse Oswald used instead of having to tell a 19 years old Buell Frazier about his martial problems.

So, the bag, which didn't contain curtain rods would have to have been smaller (actually about 10 cm) to fit between Oswald's armpit and the cup of his hand.

Which, of course, also rules out a broken down MC rifle being in that bag.

So, it wasn't curtain rods and it wasn't a rifle and Oswald said it was his lunch but that's a mighty long lunch and why on earth would he stick one end into his armpit? Ewww!



JohnM