Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Buell Wesley Frazier  (Read 149537 times)

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #232 on: October 07, 2018, 08:20:10 PM »
Advertisement
Isn't there a photo of Buell holding the package like he said Oswald held it? I'm sure I've see one somewhere.

Just remembered, it's on a previous page.
« Last Edit: October 07, 2018, 08:23:47 PM by Ray Mitcham »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #232 on: October 07, 2018, 08:20:10 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #233 on: October 07, 2018, 08:29:32 PM »
Tell you what, I'll try to post a photo tomorrow. Too busy to sort it tonight.

Just thought on, though, you probably won't think that the stick is 27", and that I'm cheating. You'll just have to take my word for it. I've actually tried this before so I'm not inventing it.

Huh? How about you use a tape measure and then the dimensions will be beyond dispute.

JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #234 on: October 07, 2018, 08:59:10 PM »
What a pity we don't have photos or drawing to show what she meant. Seems  that, like me, you disbelieve what she said. Difference is I believe Linnie and Buell were lying about the bag. You seem to believe that they both  saw the bag but don't believe their estimates of the size.

Oswald put his long package on the back seat and lied to the DP when he said his rifle lunch was on his lap.
Oswald told the DP that his long package contained his lunch.
Buell said that Oswald told him that the package contained curtain rods.

Here's Linnie and Buell demonstrating their guesstimates for Oswald's "lunch" package.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #234 on: October 07, 2018, 08:59:10 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #235 on: October 08, 2018, 12:14:25 AM »
What a pity we don't have photos or drawing to show what she meant. Seems  that, like me, you disbelieve what she said. Difference is I believe Linnie and Buell were lying about the bag. You seem to believe that they both  saw the bag but don't believe their estimates of the size.

Actually it's easy to understand what Randle meant, at least with how the bag was gripped. A few months ago I thought the bag might have been carried with a choke grip, and slightly bent arm. I tested that myself at the time... but, that doesn't make sense if he was trying to reduce the package profile. Seems Randle's carry-description would keep the bag right beside him.

Based on Randle's first-day report of an approximate 36" bag length, her brother's rather aggressive handling in interrogation, and then the incredible shrinking bag popping up, one can reasonably argue that FBI/Dallas weren't the only folks taking a CYA stance. So I'm not unreservedly calling them liars in the nasty sense that Johnny666 and others here use. I'm more inclined to place them in the 'white lie' category, as there was never going to be a trial anyway, and Buell had to live down the fact that he drove the potential killer to work that day.

Alternately, as JohnM has just posted, the approximations are in the ballpark as compared to the Rather demo.
« Last Edit: October 08, 2018, 12:46:01 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #236 on: October 08, 2018, 01:06:20 AM »
Actually it's easy to understand what Randle meant, at least with how the bag was gripped. A few months ago I thought the bag might have been carried with a choke grip, and slightly bent arm. I tested that myself at the time... but, that doesn't make sense if he was trying to reduce the package profile. Seems Randle's carry-description would keep the bag right beside him.

Based on Randle's first-day report of an approximate 36" bag length, her brother's rather aggressive handling in interrogation, and then the incredible shrinking bag popping up, one can reasonably argue that FBI/Dallas weren't the only folks taking a CYA stance. So I'm not unreservedly calling them liars in the nasty sense that Johnny666 and others here use. I'm more inclined to place them in the 'white lie' category, as there was never going to be a trial anyway, and Buell had to live down the fact that he drove the potential killer to work that day.

Alternately, as JohnM has just posted, the approximations are in the ballpark as compared to the Rather demo.

the approximations are in the ballpark as compared to the Rather demo.

The problem is;....  Rather's package not only doesn't look like CE 142 that Detective Montgomery carried from the TSBD...It doesn't fit the description of the sack that Linnie Mae Randle and BWF said they saw Lee carry that morning.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #236 on: October 08, 2018, 01:06:20 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #237 on: October 08, 2018, 04:19:40 AM »
the approximations are in the ballpark as compared to the Rather demo.

The problem is;....  Rather's package not only doesn't look like CE 142 that Detective Montgomery carried from the TSBD...It doesn't fit the description of the sack that Linnie Mae Randle and BWF said they saw Lee carry that morning.

Let's just forget about Rather and focus on the WC investigation. If I remember correctly they showed both witnesses the original and the replica bag and both denied it was the bag they had seen. They asked Frazier and Randle to reproduce multiple copies of the bag that none of them came close to the size the WC needed to conceal a broken down MC rifle.

When they couldn't get Frazier and Randle on board on the size they just said they were mistaken..... What more does anybody else need to know, when investigators start making up their own truth and dismissing the only witnesses who actually saw the bag?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #238 on: October 08, 2018, 05:23:51 AM »
Let's just forget about Rather and focus on the WC investigation. If I remember correctly they showed both witnesses the original and the replica bag and both denied it was the bag they had seen. They asked Frazier and Randle to reproduce multiple copies of the bag that none of them came close to the size the WC needed to conceal a broken down MC rifle.

When they couldn't get Frazier and Randle on board on the size they just said they were mistaken..... What more does anybody else need to know, when investigators start making up their own truth and dismissing the only witnesses who actually saw the bag?

34.8" broken down
Randle estimates 36" package first-day

Buell gets raked over the coals in first-day interrogation
xxxx these xxxxxxxxx for threatening me, figures Buell
Cool sister says lets bs these d-bags and cover our butts

It's every man for himself. The bag shrinks.
« Last Edit: October 08, 2018, 05:31:42 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #239 on: October 08, 2018, 05:42:13 AM »
Randle estimates 36" package first-day

Nope.. Bookhout wrote that this was Randle's estimate. Prove she actually said it!

Futhermore, if what Bookhout wrote in his FB 302 is true, Randle committed perjury in her WC testimony. Was she ever prosecuted?

Make up your own reality as much as you like, but the only two witnesses who ever saw the bag Oswald carried say your reality is wrong, regardless of what Bookhout wrote!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Buell Wesley Frazier
« Reply #239 on: October 08, 2018, 05:42:13 AM »