Prayer Woman

[Royell Storing]

With regard to the apple pic you posted, compare the Color of the inside of the apple that kid is holding to the Color of her Eye Balls. There is a difference. The inside of that apple is Not the BRIGHT White we are seeing on the Wiegman frames. To my eye, the Bright White of her Eye Balls is almost identical to the Bright White color of a styrofoam cup commonly used in break rooms throughout this country. I have No Idea as to what might be in the other hand of the person in question. 

[Royell Storing]

Excellent post 

The questions in bold have an obvious answer: Mr Oswald had an alibi that checked out, and it was ruthlessly suppressed.

Mr Kamp's resourcefulness has allowed Mr Oswald to tell us his side of the story for the very first time.

Why-------knowing that Captain Fritz & Co. lied, and drawing the all-too-obvious inference from this grand lie--------should we disbelieve what Mr Oswald is telling us?

     I prefer relying on Evidence/Corroboration vs "inference" when making a determination as to what is a Fact or what I believe to be The Truth. This would Especially apply to the Alibi of a suspect.

[Alan Ford]

      With regard to the apple pic you posted, compare the Color of the inside of the apple that kid is holding to the Color of her Eye Balls. There is a difference. The inside of that apple is Not the BRIGHT White we are seeing on the Wiegman frames. To my eye, the Bright White of her Eye Balls is almost identical to the Bright White color of a styrofoam cup commonly used in break rooms throughout this country. I have No Idea as to what might be in the other hand of the person in question.

I'm sorry, Mr Storing, but you're straining here. Look at the white of the apple, compare it to the child's white tshirt. White both-----and not appreciably less white than a styrofoam cup. And the inside of many green apples are even whiter than the inside of this apple.

[Alan Ford]

     I prefer relying on Evidence/Corroboration vs "inference" when making a determination as to what is a Fact or what I believe to be The Truth. This would Especially apply to the Alibi of a suspect.

Well, this might explain why you're rather late to the Prayer Man party. In the case of a cover-up, where by definition crucial evidence has been suppressed, researchers must use inference to tease out the truth. And it was a set of brilliant inferences that predicted quite precisely the contents of the now-revealed Hosty note. The Hosty note now gives us the hard evidence we sought that Mr Oswald's claimed alibi was suppressed.

If Mr Oswald was telling the truth about having gone outside, yet is not Prayer Man, then where is he? And who the hell is Prayer Man?

If Mr Oswald was not telling the truth about having gone outside, and is not Prayer Man, then why was his lie suppressed? And who the hell is Prayer Man?

 

[Royell Storing]

I'm sorry, Mr Storing, but you're straining here. Look at the white of the apple, compare it to the child's white tshirt. White both-----and not appreciably whiter than a styrofoam cup.

    Maybe we are having a conflicting Monitor and or Vision issue with regard to  viewing the reproduction of the image you posted. There is No Way the inside of that apple is even close to the same color as the child's sleeve or eye balls. The Eye Balls are Bright White, the Sleeves are Off-White matching the inside/neck we also see, vs the inside of the Apple having a slight Green tinge to it. 3 different objects of 3 differing colors.

[Royell Storing]

Well, this might explain why you're rather late to the Prayer Man party. In the case of a cover-up, researchers must use inference to tease out the truth. And it was a set of brilliant inferences that predicted quite precisely the contents of the now-revealed Hosty note. The Hosty note now gives us the hard evidence we sought that Mr Oswald's claimed alibi was suppressed.

If Mr Oswald was telling the truth about having gone outside, yet is not Prayer Man, then where is he?

 

         Burying the Hosty Notes could have been done to also bury a Conspiracy and put the USA populace at ease. This conspiracy could also have included Oswald at some level. The act of burying the Hosty Notes does not all by itself absolve Oswald of being involved in the assassination of JFK. Those notes also do Not automatically place him on the steps of the TSBD.

[Alan Ford]

         Burying the Hosty Notes could have been done to also bury a Conspiracy and put the USA populace at ease.

  ('also'?)

This conspiracy could also have included Oswald at some level. The act of burying the Hosty Notes does not all by itself absolve Oswald of being involved in the assassination of JFK.

 

Those notes also do Not automatically place him on the steps of the TSBD.

They tell us that the authorities were terrified of his claims'----------visit to 2nd fl lunchroom before not after shooting + going outside to watch P. Parade---------becoming known. Now why would that be?

(Hint: Lunchroom Incident + Prayer Man.)

[Alan Ford]

Friends, the hostility of Lone Nutters to Prayer Man is understandable. This thing is a religion to them, and they will not give up their faith without a fight.

The hostility----------and that's what it is-----------of so many Warren Critics is more puzzling, though not wholly incomprehensible.

I think they split into three groups

-------------Those unfamiliar with the details of the theory who just lazily and haughtily assume it has no more merit than the LHO-in-Altgens nonsense that long plagued JFK research
-------------Those for whom this case is such a longtime hobby that they do not want to see it solved------------the anti-climax would be too great!
-------------Those who pinned their colors to the anti-PM=LHO mast, do not want to admit they got it wrong and are jealous of those who got it right (O vanitas vanitatum!)

Since the Hosty note revelation, all three groups have one thing in common: they are saying flat out that Mr Oswald lied about his whereabouts and that Captain Fritz & Co.'s astonishingly brazen suppression of his lie is of no evidentiary significance.

They would rather adopt a cover-up mentality than embrace the truly wonderful fact that this case has been blown wide open. Sad!