Another bump, for Brian.
Can we tell a sleeve "in direct sunlight" from a bare arm, in an image where the person under scrutiny has no discernible facial features? Fat chance but atm my money's on what the above image is telling me and that's kinda "obvious".
TYG, I did your dirty work for you, or rather I cleaned your mess up. Hit the link above the quote to see it in it's full context(a cword you may like to look up btw).
This is for the inner Brian.
Listen, I know it's personal, both for you and Duncan and I don't blame youz. I mean, I'm aware of the Moorman in the street issue for example and was it "the famous five" or something? The team of debunkers and how personal that got, but as far as I read, it never got as cheap as this. But it's completely retraded to troll everyone that disagrees with you when you're this obvious about it.
Another thing about the Darnell sleeve frame, just look at how bleached out the people in front of PM are, how do you know the arm area on PM isn't being effected by all that artificial light. Like I'd ask you... Anyway there's a mistake, because I still believe, like I saida before, that PM whoever he is, is IMO fully shaded(perhaps the hand is in the sun but that's it). HAND.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d209/1d2091eca312a8c8b4a6e7f2e8c35f861a8b9a0f" alt="Smiley :)"