Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 609790 times)

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1928 on: July 11, 2019, 09:33:54 PM »
Advertisement
It's almost like they are the kooks and we are the straight one's.
We had people that knew Stanton personally, family members, tell us[Brian] that PM is not her.  Brian went into full denial mode as usual but with Larry, it didn't even register.  He claimed he'd never heard it despite listening to the taped interview, queried it when I brought it up but has never since actually admitted it's implications dispite me pointing it to him directly.  He appears to take himself seriously at least, his insights quoted by himself more often than not.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1928 on: July 11, 2019, 09:33:54 PM »


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1929 on: July 12, 2019, 10:36:57 PM »
Y
I just want to show folks what you see when you go to quote one of our other Stanton supporters.  This is just one line, with three words in it.  What is he on?

Aside from your apparent need to personally attack, just what is it in print that you are disputing? Just what is your claim? Evidence?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1930 on: July 13, 2019, 04:48:37 AM »
No, LarryTrotterImage, these are your words as you keep re-posting "reminders" over and over again:

Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by Prayer PersonImage aka PrayerWomanImage.

What research?  What evidence?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1930 on: July 13, 2019, 04:48:37 AM »


Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 597
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1931 on: July 13, 2019, 08:18:04 AM »
Aside from your apparent need to personally attack, just what is it in print that you are disputing? Just what is your claim? Evidence?

The reason you always add some flowery font to your posts is because you have nothing of substance otherwise.  That's the only way you can make your posts "interesting", with flowers.  And you refuse to engage your critics in a meaningful manner, something Brian could never be accused of(for the most part).  Grow up/a pair, engage and leave the daffodils at home, this is the internet, you will get crap from time to time, you can handle it.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1932 on: July 13, 2019, 06:03:11 PM »
No, LarryTrotterImage, these are your words as you keep re-posting "reminders" over and over again:

What research?  What evidence?


As stated, and copied by Iacoletti, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

So, is it your claim that there has been no research? Or, is it your claim that there has not been any evidence developed that is indicative of SarahStanton being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

If so, can you provide evidence indicative of the validity of said claim? You know, things like SarahStanton was not in that spot during the filming, because she was somewhere else, and because someone else was there at the time. Perhaps, you can review the almost 500 pages in this thread, just to make sure of the validity of your claim. And, try to pay full attention to Scully, especially when filing your repetitious claims.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1932 on: July 13, 2019, 06:03:11 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1933 on: July 13, 2019, 07:54:55 PM »
As stated, and copied by Iacoletti, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

If you have any valid evidence of Prayer person being Stanton then either present it or stop claiming it.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1934 on: July 14, 2019, 07:24:35 PM »
As stated in the summation, Notably, research has now developed evidence indicative of SarahStanton as being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage.

So, is it your claim that there has been no research? Or, is it your claim that there has not been any evidence developed that is indicative of SarahStanton being the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, aka PrayerWomanImage?

If so, can you provide evidence indicative of the validity of said claim? You know, things like SarahStanton was not in that spot during the filming, because she was somewhere else, and because someone else was there at the time. Perhaps, you can review the almost 500 pages in this thread, just to make sure of the validity of your claim. And, try to pay full attention to Scully, especially when filing your repetitious claims.
If you have any valid evidence of Prayer person being Stanton then either present it or stop claiming it.

If indeed you can provide a specific quote regarding said specific claim, please do so, as I do not recall making it. As for research developed indicative evidence that SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, it has already been presented!

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1935 on: July 14, 2019, 11:38:59 PM »
If indeed you can provide a specific quote regarding said specific claim, please do so, as I do not recall making it. As for research developed indicative evidence that SarahStanton is the person represented by PrayerPersonImage, it has already been presented!

Presented by whom, and when?  Be specific.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1935 on: July 14, 2019, 11:38:59 PM »