Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?

[Tim Nickerson]

Z-313 head shot, heard by many earwitnesses, as a shot about 1 sec after a previous shot fired. It was a rather remarkable shot that took account of JFK head turned about 45 degrees leftward, relative to his limo, leaning leftward and rather close to Jackie Kennedy,  and adjustment for limo slowing from 15mph to almost a stop in only about 2 seconds,and with a vector force of cross wind gust up to 20 mph.

Many earwitnesses were wrong. There wasn't a shot 1 second before the head shot. There were only three shots. Connally was hit by the second shot. Zapruder shows him reacting to being hit almost immediately after emerging from behind the Stemmons Freeway sign.

[Jerry Freeman]

Many earwitnesses were wrong. There wasn't a shot 1 second before the head shot. There were only three shots. Connally was hit by the second shot. Zapruder shows him reacting to being hit almost immediately after emerging from behind the Stemmons Freeway sign.

  Heard the shots he did...bullets did he see...the autopsy he performed. May the farce be with us.

[Matt Grantham]

The limo was the intended target? Why?
Oh, wait... the 'patsy' thing, right?

 So if I understand your disturbingly inane point, by considering a reenactment of whether an individual "could" get off the shots in the manner the Warren commission speculates did occur we are succumbing to an admission that that is what happened?. Say it ain't so Joe Have you considered donating your brain to science?

[John Iacoletti]

J.Edna Hoover? Who was she? FBI Expert Robert Frazier testified under oath the he was able to match the fragments to the rifle.

Yeah, by lining up the marks in his mind when they didn’t line up under the microscope. 

Too bad those “limo fragments” were “found and removed” from the crime scene before Frazier got there and have no documented chain of possession.

CE399 was found on Connally's stretcher. The earliest statements made by those who handled the stretcher confirm it.

Confirm to whom? The guy who found it said it was on the other stretcher.

I don't need to prove when the cartridges were fired. They were found in the sniper's nest and were fired in the same rifle as the two bullets that struck Kennedy.

Wait, what? How do you know those bullets struck Kennedy?

[John Iacoletti]

Many earwitnesses were wrong. There wasn't a shot 1 second before the head shot. There were only three shots. Connally was hit by the second shot. Zapruder shows him reacting to being hit almost immediately after emerging from behind the Stemmons Freeway sign.

Zapruder shows whatever the beholder wants it to show.

[Bill Chapman]

Zapruder shows whatever the beholder wants it to show.

And you are one of those doing said beholding

[Bill Chapman]

So if I understand your disturbingly inane point, by considering a reenactment of whether an individual "could" get off the shots in the manner the Warren commission speculates did occur we are succumbing to an admission that that is what happened?. Say it ain't so Joe Have you considered donating your brain to science?

Sticks and stones..

[John Mytton]

Yeah, by lining up the marks in his mind when they didn’t line up under the microscope. 

The testimony from Frazier clears up your "brief summation", btw, the evidence still exists and can be checked for verification by your expert.

Mr. EISENBERG - I think I put it down here. That is right, 567.
Mr. FRAZIER - Approximately two-thirds of a groove impression from each of the two bullets is shown, with a very small portion at the bottom of the photograph of a land impression. The individual microscopic characteristics which were used in the comparison, and on which the identification was made, were photographed and are as shown in this photograph. However, this photograph did not enter into the actual conclusion reached. The microscopic characteristics appear as parallel horizontal lines extending from the test bullet on the left to the bullet Exhibit 567 on the right.
The marks used in the identification are grooves, paired lines, a series of ridges up and down the hairline on one bullet, and they also appear on the opposite side of the photograph.
In one particular instance it will be seen that at the edge of the land impression at the lower left portion of the photograph is a very definite paired ridge which appears on the right side of the photograph but in a slightly different area.
The reason for the difference in the location of this paired line on the exhibit, Exhibit 567, can be explained by the fact that this is a jacket fragment, that it was torn from the rest of the bullet, and is greatly mutilated, distorted, and bears only a very few areas suitable for identification purposes because of that fact.
The distortion has foreshortened the area of the jacket fragment, 567, to the extent that over this approximately one-tenth-of-an-inch surface represented in this photograph, these lines do not coincide exactly on the lower part of the photograph when they are lined up on the upper part of the photograph.
Mr. EISENBERG - When you say they don't correspond exactly, do you mean at all, or do you mean they aren't--
Mr. FRAZIER - I mean that the marks are present, but they do not line up at the hairline.
Mr. EISENBERG - But in your opinion the marks on the left are the same as the marks on the right?
Mr. FRAZIER - The marks on the left are the same marks as those on the right. In the examination this is easily determined by rotating the two bullets. As you rotate them, you can see these characteristic patterns line up.
Then you will notice these do not line up. But as you rotate one bullet, you can follow the individual marks mentally and see that the same pattern is present and you can line them up in your mind, even though they are not actually physically lined up in the microscope.
Mr. McCLOY - They are not lined up in the microscope because there is mutilation on the fragment?
Mr. EISENBERG - Yes, sir.

JohnM