Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?

[Sean Kneringer]

Nine seconds + Greer slightly taking his foot off the gas every time he looked back = easy peasy.

[Jack Nessan]

Two shots in 5+ seconds. The assassination took place the way Altgens described and Don Pardo of NBC read over the air. Altgens was the only news reporter, out of 70 news reporters present in Dealey Plaza, that was an actual eyewitness. He was standing along Elm Street by the car as the shots were fired. The shooting was no great feat of marksmanship. Only two shots were fired and at distances of 55 yards and 88 yards in 5+ seconds.  All the physical evidence indicates there was only two shots. A large majority of Eyewitnesses stated there was only two shots. The idea there was three shots is a Merriman Smith invention that was first read by Walter Cronkite. Walter Cronkite then read the entire Altgens bulletin but never read the number of shots stated by Altgens.


https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=https%3a%2f%2fwww.youtube.com%2fwatch%3fv%3dfgvwA8UUaC0&view=detail&mid=A3E008023258294CC728A3E008023258294CC728&FORM=VIRE

[Jack Trojan]

2 shots in 8 or 9 seconds, slow moving target, fired by a qualified sharpshooter from 190 to 265 feet. Yeah, not too difficult.

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

[Jack Nessan]

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

Exactly how do you align a scope to a rifle configured in the manner the carcano had been configured in? The scope mounting is offset to the left side of the barrel. If you align it to be pinpoint with the rifle barrel it is only accurate at one distance. If you align the scope to be parallel with the barrel, LHO would have had to known to estimate the crosshair setting to the left for an accurate shot. 



These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.

How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?

[Jerry Freeman]

These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.

Begs the question why was a scope left on the rifle then? It provided a distraction if anything.

How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?

A nice juicy bullet that could be linked to that rifle was required to further convince the faithful that Oswald did it.

[Jack Nessan]

Begs the question why was a scope left on the rifle then? It provided a distraction if anything. A nice juicy bullet that could be linked to that rifle was required to further convince the faithful that Oswald did it.

In what way would a scope, out of the line of sight of the iron sights, be a distraction? If nothing else it would work as a telescope. The use of the iron sights was in no way hindered by the scope being mounted on the rifle.

Somebody knew in advance that the bullet would pass through JFK's neck and strike JBC in the back? They would both be in Parkland needing medical attention?

Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor.

[Jerry Freeman]

In what way would a scope, out of the line of sight of the iron sights, be a distraction? If nothing else it would work as a telescope. The use of the iron sights was in no way hindered by the scope being mounted on the rifle.

So why would someone need a telescope? Either a scope was required or it wasn't.

Somebody knew in advance that the bullet would pass through JFK's neck and strike JBC in the back? They would both be in Parkland needing medical attention?

If a bullet was indeed planted...it was while they were there. If the men who were shot and taken to Baylor Hospital ...who knows?

  Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor.

Someone knew this in advance? 

[Ted Shields]

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment?

We don't know if it was wonky when he fired it or it got wonky when he stashed the rifle or when it was clumsily handled by the police when they found it before the FBI tested it.

And, if there was a shot from the knoll, how was the left side of his head relatively undamaged? A rifle shot from that close and that trajectory would've went through his head. And hollow point ammo would've blown his head apart like a watermelon.