One sees a lot of stories, such as the recent discussion about FBI agent Odum's claim that he knew nothing,according to an interview by Thompson and Aguilar, about showing the Parkland bullet to anyone, which is in contradiction to FBI report that he did I have seen other stories where an individual has said something to the FBI later to learn the official record of the FBI claims they have said something else entirely or no record of their statement exists. In a similar vein, some of the major stories where individuals gave films or other physical evidence of the FBI, or perhaps other officials of various sorts, and never heard about those contributions ever again could be second similar category Final category would be a list of witnesses not called by the Warren Commission that had obvious significance to the case
I know there are issues of what criteria would be needed for a particular situation to be legitimate in terms of the person supposedly wronged in some manner might be
