Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.  (Read 32067 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2018, 04:40:59 AM »
Advertisement
Numerous people and groups far more qualified than LHO failed in recreations over the years.

Name them.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2018, 04:40:59 AM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2018, 04:44:52 AM »
If it wasn't going to be used, why would it have been left on the rifle then?

Perhaps Oswald didn't know he was going to use the irons until after he fired the first shot while looking through the scope.

Offline Zeon Wasinsky

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2018, 06:38:39 AM »
Perhaps Oswald didn't know he was going to use the irons until after he fired the first shot while looking through the scope.

There was no reason to have ever removed the scope mount in the 1st place. The so called 38" bag that was never photographed where it allegedly was found at the SN, was 8" width flat and 6" diameter.  The scope could have been left attached after barrel removed from stock and stil fit in that bag:






JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2018, 06:38:39 AM »


Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2018, 06:53:21 AM »
LOL! It took him three tries before he actually hit the target. You call that superhuman marksmanship? You kooks crack me up.

Huh? Didn't the MB and the head shot hit the target? Isn't that 2 for 2 using the iron sights after missing the 1st shot thru the wonky scope? You're  bloody right that's superhuman marksmanship. Has anyone replicated it? You dumasses crack me up.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2018, 07:02:38 AM »
There was no reason to have ever removed the scope mount in the 1st place. The so called 38" bag that was never photographed where it allegedly was found at the SN, was 8" width flat and 6" diameter.  The scope could have been left attached after barrel removed from stock and stil fit in that bag:



The reason to exclude the scope was because it was more than useless. It was in the way. Why include it when you know you aren't going to use it? Give Oswald some credit. The scope was never sighted in so he was either an expert marksman that kept a useless scope on the rifle and used the iron sights or he was a patsy that never even took a shot and the scope was left on the rifle to match the BYPs as part of his sheep-dipping. Since no one has duplicated this feat, I lean toward the latter.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2018, 07:02:38 AM »


Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #29 on: April 10, 2018, 07:15:21 AM »
Perhaps Oswald didn't know he was going to use the irons until after he fired the first shot while looking through the scope.

Come on. Do you know how ridiculous that sounds? Oswald knew the scope wasn't sighted in and therefore useless. In which case, why even take the 1st shot looking thru the scope? Damned impressive recovery, however, to bolt in the next 2 rounds and score twice after switching to the iron sights in 5 secs flat. Any honest military marksman would confirm that.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #30 on: April 10, 2018, 12:42:40 PM »
The reason to exclude the scope was because it was more than useless. It was in the way. Why include it when you know you aren't going to use it? Give Oswald some credit. The scope was never sighted in so he was either an expert marksman that kept a useless scope on the rifle and used the iron sights or he was a patsy that never even took a shot and the scope was left on the rifle to match the BYPs as part of his sheep-dipping. Since no one has duplicated this feat, I lean toward the latter.

No.

The scope was not in the way.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2018, 12:43:21 PM »
The reason to exclude the scope was because it was more than useless. It was in the way. Why include it when you know you aren't going to use it? Give Oswald some credit. The scope was never sighted in so he was either an expert marksman that kept a useless scope on the rifle and used the iron sights or he was a patsy that never even took a shot and the scope was left on the rifle to match the BYPs as part of his sheep-dipping. Since no one has duplicated this feat, I lean toward the latter.

The scope was never sighted in so he was either an expert marksman that kept a useless scope on the rifle and used the iron sights or he was a patsy that never even took a shot

The fact that the worthless scope was on the rifle is also an indication that Lee was set up....  That scope lent credence to the tale that was immediately broadcast that the arch villain Lee Harrrrrvey Osssssswald (Booooo Hisssss !) was crack shot with a high powered and highly accurate rifle that was equipped with a "telescopic Sight".   

We now know that the "telescopic sight" was nothing but a stage prop to trick us into accepting the tale that was being presented.   There are still many suckers who refuse to accept the FACT that they were duped, and the scope was used to sell them the lie......


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Things Ct's can do to prove a conspiracy.
« Reply #31 on: April 10, 2018, 12:43:21 PM »