The evidence was not presented based upon your satisfaction, approval, and/ or agreement.
You didn't present any evidence at all -- just several unsupported claims.
It is your turn, now it is time to show the evidence that exhonerates LHO and explains who was really responsible for the assassination. You have given a constant stream of posts as to why a piece evidence is not the answer now is the time to be either a contender or a pretender. The stage is all yours. If there was evidence of another person present it.
Yet another "Oswald did it" devotee who doesn't understand burden of proof. I never claimed that Oswald was innocent or that I knew who was really responsible for the assassination. You, on the other hand, claimed that "LHO is the most likely candidate" and tried to justify that with statements that can't even withstand the slightest amount of scrutiny.
"His fingerprints". How compelling.
Then you try to smear Arnold Rowland and completely ignore that Howard Brennan did all the same things you criticize Rowland for and more.