Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Non problematic evidence?  (Read 31156 times)

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2018, 09:46:48 PM »
Advertisement
Jerry,

On it's own, CE-399 doesn't tell us much of anything. It has to be coupled with at least one other piece of evidence to have any evidentiary value. The same goes with pretty much all of the evidence. And that's why I haven't bothered responding to the OP.

So, basically you agree that there is not one single piece of physical evidence conclusively tied to Oswald which is of such significance that it beyond reasonable doubt clearly points to his guilt?

Could it actually be your position that all there really is are some individual pieces of physical evidence which perhaps can be tentatively linked to Oswald in some creative manner and require support from other similar pieces to construct a mere circumstantial case by making assumptions?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2018, 09:46:48 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2018, 11:06:03 PM »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2018, 11:07:20 PM »
Jerry,

On it's own, CE-399 doesn't tell us much of anything. It has to be coupled with at least one other piece of evidence to have any evidentiary value. The same goes with pretty much all of the evidence. And that's why I haven't bothered responding to the OP.

It has no evidentiary value no matter what you couple it with.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2018, 11:07:20 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2018, 11:08:02 PM »
What did I tell you!



Yes, Mytton is so predictable.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2018, 11:08:47 PM »
Could it actually be your position that all there really is are some individual pieces of physical evidence which perhaps can be tentatively linked to Oswald in some creative manner and require support from other similar pieces to construct a mere circumstantial case by making assumptions?

That's pretty much the entire case against Oswald in a nutshell.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2018, 11:08:47 PM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2018, 11:59:02 PM »
That's pretty much the entire case against Oswald in a nutshell.

Agreed. Let's see if there is somebody who can prove us wrong!

Obviously, if they can't the case against Oswald is lost by default except perhaps for some die hard LNs and those who believe Disneyland is a real country.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3724
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2018, 03:23:01 AM »
  It is worthless

Yeah... :P...was as close as I could come to 'tongue in cheek' ;D

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2018, 09:52:36 PM »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Non problematic evidence?
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2018, 09:52:36 PM »