Non problematic evidence?

[Martin Weidmann]

Can anybody name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied to Oswald which is of such significance that it beyond reasonable doubt clearly points to his guilt?

[Ray Mitcham]

Can anybody name one piece of physical evidence conclusively tied to Oswald which is of such significance that it beyond reasonable doubt clearly points to his guilt?

Prepare yourself for  long wait, Martin.

[John Iacoletti]

I predict if you get any answer at all, it will be a variation of one of the following:

- A nonspecific reference to Bugliosi's "53".
- A nonspecific reference to "mountains" of evidence
- "Nothing would satisfy you people other than a video of Oswald in the act"
- "It's in the history books"
- "What's your evidence that Oswald didn't do it?"
- "Name your shooter"
- "Prove there was a conspiracy"

Pretty much anything other than an actual answer to the question you asked.

[Martin Weidmann]

Prepare yourself for  long wait, Martin.

Don't worry, I have survival kits to last me a very long time. 

[John Mytton]

JohnM

[Walt Cakebread]

JohnM

Ha,Ha,ha..Hee,hee,hee....  I love it when a fool makes a bigger fool of himself.....  Or IOW verifies that he's a moroon..

[Jerry Freeman]

   

       Commission Exhibit 399? 

[Tim Nickerson]

   

       Commission Exhibit 399? 

Jerry,

On it's own, CE-399 doesn't tell us much of anything. It has to be coupled with at least one other piece of evidence to have any evidentiary value. The same goes with pretty much all of the evidence. And that's why I haven't bothered responding to the OP.