Non problematic evidence?

[Martin Weidmann]

If you have anything new to discuss, let?s hear it!

Another way to avoid misunderstandings is to avoid jumping to conclusions.

Another way to avoid misunderstandings is to avoid jumping to conclusions.

No, because jumping to conclusions is part of a process to trying to understand. Even if one does not jump to a conclusion the misunderstanding will still be there, albeit unresolved.

When you keep talking in riddles and implicitely saying things that you claim you are not saying, you basically invite people to jump to conclusions.

The conclusion I have now jumped to whilst btw having an open mind, is that you, like some of your LN brothers, have nothing significant to offer and are only wasting my time.

[Charles Collins]

Another way to avoid misunderstandings is to avoid jumping to conclusions.

No, because jumping to conclusions is part of a process to trying to understand. Even if one does not jump to a conclusion the misunderstand will still be there, albeit unresolved.

When you keep talking in riddles and implicitely saying things that you claim you are not saying, you basically invite people to jump to conclusions.

The conclusion I have now jumped to whilst btw having in open mind, is that you, like some of your LN brothers, have nothing significant to offer and are only wasting my time.

Asking a question instead of telling someone that they said something that they didn?t might be something for you to consider doing.

So please ignore me. I promise I won?t be offended.

[Martin Weidmann]

Asking a question instead of telling someone that they said something that they didn?t might be something for you to consider doing.

So please ignore me. I promise I won?t be offended.

Asking a question instead of telling someone that they said something that they didn?t

That wouldn't happen of course if you answered questions to begin with, which of course you don't!

So please ignore me.

Since you offer no contribution to the discussion(s) or the forum, that might indeed be the best advice you have ever given.


You seem to be eager to give other people advice on what they should do, so let's see if you are as equally eager at accepting advice; perhaps you should ask yourself why the majority of people you have talked to in your posts since re-joining all have the same or at least similar opinion of you?.

[Charles Collins]

Asking a question instead of telling someone that they said something that they didn?t

That wouldn't happen of course if you answered questions to begin with, which of course you don't!

So please ignore me.

Since you offer no contribution to the discussion(s) or the forum, that might indeed be the best advice you have ever given.


You seem to be eager to give other people advice on what they should do, so let's see if you are as equally eager at accepting advice; perhaps you should ask yourself why the majority of people you have talked to in your posts since re-joining all have the same or at least similar opinion of you?.

I am not here for a popularity contest.

[Bill Chapman]

Another way to avoid misunderstandings is to avoid jumping to conclusions.

No, because jumping to conclusions is part of a process to trying to understand. Even if one does not jump to a conclusion the misunderstanding will still be there, albeit unresolved.

When you keep talking in riddles and implicitely saying things that you claim you are not saying, you basically invite people to jump to conclusions.

The conclusion I have now jumped to whilst btw having an open mind, is that you, like some of your LN brothers, have nothing significant to offer and are only wasting my time.

Get an LNer to translate for you.
 

In the meantime, Lord Haughty, any chance that you can offer 'something significant' about who besides the CTer (No-Name) shooter knew there was to be an attempt made on Kennedy that day?

[Charles Collins]

[/quot
>>> Charles you can fix your HTML by adding an "e" and a square bracket to this

Thanks I didn?t realize that had happened (fixed it)

[Martin Weidmann]

I am not here for a popularity contest.

So you can say why you are not here, but you can't or won't say why you are here not taking part in discussions. You are truly hilarious!

[Charles Collins]

So you can say why you are not here, but you can't or won't say why you are here not taking part in discussions. You are truly hilarious!

I was 10-years old and in the classroom at school when the assassination took place. I think that most everyone would agree that it is highly unlikely that I had anything to do with any alleged conspiracy. You might want to consider refocusing your attention to the assassination. Most readers are probably more interested in the assassination than they are in little old me.