Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence  (Read 23981 times)

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« on: April 30, 2018, 02:14:40 AM »
Advertisement
    Test 1:  Spectrographic Analysis
                 Oswald's paraffin casts were subjected to two analyses. Spectrographic analysis , the method normally used by the police, showed evidence of barium and antimony on Oswald's hands , but not on his cheek .

    Test 2:   Neutron Activation Analysis on Oswald
                 Spectrographic analysis was considered sufficiently reliable for criminal investigations, but in this case a more incisive test was also used. Neutron activation analysis, which is capable of identifying the presence of substances in quantities much to small to be captured by spectrographic analysis, also showed no incriminating quantities of residues on Oswald's cheek. The result was reported in an internal Warren Commission memo: " At best, the analysis shows that Oswald may have fired a pistol, although this is by no means certain. ... There is no basis for concluding that he also fired a rifle."

    Test 3:   Controlled Neutron Activation Analysis

                  In order to check the validity of the neutron activation analysis of Oswald's paraffin casts, a controlled test was made. Seven marksmen fired a rifle of the same type as that found on the sixth floor. The standard paraffin test was administered, and the paraffin casts were subjected to neutron activation analysis. All seven subjects showed substantial amounts of barium and antimony on their hands and more impotantly , on their cheeks.

The absence of significant quantities of residues on Oswald's cheek meant that he almost certainly had not fired a rifle that day.

JFK Assassination Forum

Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« on: April 30, 2018, 02:14:40 AM »


Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2018, 03:01:43 AM »
    Test 1:  Spectrographic Analysis
                 Oswald's paraffin casts were subjected to two analyses. Spectrographic analysis , the method normally used by the police, showed evidence of barium and antimony on Oswald's hands , but not on his cheek .

    Test 2:   Neutron Activation Analysis on Oswald
                 Spectrographic analysis was considered sufficiently reliable for criminal investigations, but in this case a more incisive test was also used. Neutron activation analysis, which is capable of identifying the presence of substances in quantities much to small to be captured by spectrographic analysis, also showed no incriminating quantities of residues on Oswald's cheek. The result was reported in an internal Warren Commission memo: " At best, the analysis shows that Oswald may have fired a pistol, although this is by no means certain. ... There is no basis for concluding that he also fired a rifle."

    Test 3:   Controlled Neutron Activation Analysis

                  In order to check the validity of the neutron activation analysis of Oswald's paraffin casts, a controlled test was made. Seven marksmen fired a rifle of the same type as that found on the sixth floor. The standard paraffin test was administered, and the paraffin casts were subjected to neutron activation analysis. All seven subjects showed substantial amounts of barium and antimony on their hands and more impotantly , on their cheeks.

The absence of significant quantities of residues on Oswald's cheek meant that he almost certainly had not fired a rifle that day.

In 1963: The Paraffin test was known to be essentially worthless. It was prone to false positives and false negatives. It was used to trick naive suspects into giving a confession.

However, you seem to believe in the effectiveness of the paraffin test. Does that mean that you accept that Lee Harvey Oswald fired "a gun" on Friday 22 November 1963? You know... the Smith & Wesson revolver with which he shot Office JD Tippit. The discarded bullet hulls from the gun being found near the crime scene were matched to the weapon to the exclusion of all others.

If not: How do you think Oswald got "nitrates" on his hands on Friday 22 November 1963?
« Last Edit: April 30, 2018, 09:57:26 AM by Ross Lidell »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10815
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2018, 08:59:19 PM »
The absence of significant quantities of residues on Oswald's cheek meant that he almost certainly had not fired a rifle that day.

The lame LN excuse for this is that he scrubbed his face when he was at the rooming house.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2018, 08:59:19 PM »


Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2018, 09:02:53 PM »
The lame LN excuse for this is that he scrubbed his face when he was at the rooming house.

 But not his hands apparently

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2018, 10:25:37 PM »
 Yes

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2018, 10:25:37 PM »


Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2018, 10:49:36 PM »
But not his hands apparently
His (Oswald's) hands got nitrates on them when he used his Smith & Wesson revolver to murder Office JD Tippit.

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2018, 10:59:25 PM »
His (Oswald's) hands got nitrates on them when he used his Smith & Wesson revolver to murder Office JD Tippit.

 Just barium and antimony which you apparently could get from handling books

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2018, 11:05:09 PM »
Just barium and antimony which you apparently could get from handling books

As I said: In 1963 paraffin tests were essentially worthless.

Did Lee Harvey Oswald do any work on the morning of Friday 22 November 1963? If he didn't, your theory is worthless.

Incidentally, can you prove the books/barium & antimony assertion?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Three Tests Proved Oswald's Innocence
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2018, 11:05:09 PM »