I don?t think anyone can get off two shots, accurate or inaccurate, within a fraction of a second.
But how about getting a ?Crack-Thump? from just one shot. Would that count as getting two loud sounds, within a fraction of a second of each other? A single shot that could be misinterpreted as two separate shots, almost one top of each other? I think that could be done.
If the first shot, at z152, did not pass by Mary Woodward, she might not hear the ?Crack? of that shot. But she may have been able to hear the ?Crack? of either of the following two shots.
how about getting a ?Crack-Thump? from just one shot. Would that count as getting two loud sounds, within a fraction of a second of each other? A single shot that could be misinterpreted as two separate shots, almost one top of each other? I think that could be done.You're right Mr Elloitt..... I've actually experience the sound of three bangs from a single shot.....The bangs were very close spaced and might be confused with separate shots ....
I was down range from a hunter who fired a shot over my head ......I heard the bullet break the sound barrier over my head then the muzzle blast of the rifle, and then the bang of the bullet hitting a nearby tree or something...
All three bangs were very closely spaced.....
So a person down range from a rifle might hear two closely spaced shots...... However in this case then Woodward would probably have hears six bangs ( if there were three shots ) However the sound of a bullet hitting flesh does not create a bang....( it sounds like a hard slap) ....so Woodward should have heard four bangs .....( and a couple of slaps)
but more closely spaced that could be accomplished with a cranky old bolt action rifle.....