Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo

[Mike Orr]

As per  Reply #6 on this topic     " Re: Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo "

Mr. George Whitaker said that the original windshield , with the bullet hole in it , had been broken up and scrapped---as ordered---after the new windshield had been made.

[Jack Trojan]

As per  Reply #6 on this topic     " Re: Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo "

Mr. George Whitaker said that the original windshield , with the bullet hole in it , had been broken up and scrapped---as ordered---after the new windshield had been made.

Who ordered that?

[Matt Grantham]

Who ordered that?

 Jack The short answer is Whitaker's superiors at the Ford Motor Company The link below provides some interesting material on how one of episodes of The Men Who Killed Kennedy, presented by the History channel was pulled after it's first airing, and how Bill Moyer's and others, insisted the episode be removed and apparently some of the footage regarding the window is no longer available to the public It always just becomes a bigger and bigger outrage

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/06/douglas-p-horne/photographic-evidence-of-bullet-hole-in-jfk-limousine-windshield-hiding-in-plain-sight/

[Mike Orr]

    This is another one of those eye witness situations where some people see a through and through bullet hole in the JFK limo windshield and then they pretend to have the real windshield on display that shows that there is nothing but a cracked windshield , so all the eye witnesses are told that they are wrong about what they saw . That's why Trump is waiting another 3&1/2 years to release the last of the JFK files and of course hope that some of the people whose names might appear on those files will be dead and of course Trump will be out of office by then so it will be up to the next President to release the files or to hold them a bit longer just in case the people who haven't died in the next 3&1/2 years ,will then get another couple of years until they do pass on. National Security is a BS shield to hide behind making it sound like something really, really bad is going to happen if these documents are released . Like Jim Marrs said , " We already know what happened " !

[Tim Nickerson]

Jack The short answer is Whitaker's superiors at the Ford Motor Company The link below provides some interesting material on how one of episodes of The Men Who Killed Kennedy, presented by the History channel was pulled after it's first airing, and how Bill Moyer's and others, insisted the episode be removed and apparently some of the footage regarding the window is no longer available to the public It always just becomes a bigger and bigger outrage

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/06/douglas-p-horne/photographic-evidence-of-bullet-hole-in-jfk-limousine-windshield-hiding-in-plain-sight/

Doug Horne/Lew Rockwell article ? Whitaker
https://ss100x.wordpress.com/tag/whitaker/

"This story is patently ridiculous. SS100X had a stock LCC windshield. It could have been replaced anywhere, including at Love Field when it sat on the tarmac in the AF C-130 for over two hours. In addition, there is no evidence of any nature to indicate that Whitaker ever saw the limo (as he describes it so inaccurately) or that the limo had any connection to the Rouge. It then goes without saying that nothing Whitaker says about the windshield has any significance. How a reasoning person can fall for such illogical statements as these, I have no clue. But, every so often, another unsuspecting newbie comes by and gets tripped up by this disinfo. Then they tend to go around in circles huffing and puffing when asked to provide even a shred of documentation for any of Whitaker?s claims."

[Matt Grantham]

Doug Horne/Lew Rockwell article ? Whitaker
https://ss100x.wordpress.com/tag/whitaker/

"This story is patently ridiculous. SS100X had a stock LCC windshield. It could have been replaced anywhere, including at Love Field when it sat on the tarmac in the AF C-130 for over two hours. In addition, there is no evidence of any nature to indicate that Whitaker ever saw the limo (as he describes it so inaccurately) or that the limo had any connection to the Rouge. It then goes without saying that nothing Whitaker says about the windshield has any significance. How a reasoning person can fall for such illogical statements as these, I have no clue. But, every so often, another unsuspecting newbie comes by and gets tripped up by this disinfo. Then they tend to go around in circles huffing and puffing when asked to provide even a shred of documentation for any of Whitaker?s claims."

 Whittakers an afterthought We already have reliable witnesses who saw a through and through hole There is no chain of custody on the window, know verifiable report on the windshield early on in the investigation, and the cracking looks much different in the later photographs from the interior looking out Even with the through and through hole there is enough damage to call into question whether you are running out of fragments to explain the damage that is shown in the original photographs

[Tim Nickerson]

Whittakers an afterthought We already have reliable witnesses who saw a through and through hole There is no chain of custody on the window, know verifiable report on the windshield early on in the investigation, and the cracking looks much different in the later photographs from the interior looking out Even with the through and through hole there is enough damage to call into question whether you are running out of fragments to explain the damage that is shown in the original photographs

What do you mean by "no chain of custody on the window"?

know verifiable report on the windshield early on in the investigation

From FBI Agent Robert Frazier:

[Matt Grantham]

What do you mean by "no chain of custody on the window"?

From FBI Agent Robert Frazier:

 I asked the chain of custody question earlier, so I should have stated no chain of custody that anyone here has so far provided. I should have stated that differently