Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo

[Patrick Jackson]

These three photos were taken in the same garage comparing the hat on the wall:




There is absolutely no doubt that this crack

is same as these cracks.


Question is in which garage the first three photos were taken?

Also, this

and this

and this

photos were not taken at the same spot. Were they taken in the same garage?

Also, note the mud on the wheels, where did the mud came from, where did they drove the limo?

[Allan Fritzke]

These three photos were taken in the same garage comparing the hat on the wall:




There is absolutely no doubt that this crack

is same as these cracks.


Question is in which garage the first three photos were taken?

Also, this

and this

and this

photos were not taken at the same spot. Were they taken in the same garage?

Also, note the mud on the wheels, where did the mud came from, where did they drove the limo?

Very Nice!   Clearly the first 3 photos don't show cracks.  How are they even related to the others?  Can you see if someone took the liberty to roll down the partially raised side window by Nellie Connally's seat which can be scene in the Zapruder frames?   I would ask at which garage(s) was this car parked in as well? What is the other vehicle (truck?) doing in this garage. A cube van or Fire Truck? Additional questions:       Is this at the Whitehouse?  Is the photo detailed enough that we can get a read on the license plate? Or is there too much light aberration?!  When were the photos taken?  It certainly looks like irregular dirt lines on the tires as it is near the tread line and not light aberration - maybe wrong though!

Why do none of these pictures even remotely come close to what this man describes on December 18, 1963.  He claimed he went to look at in the Whitehouse Garage (specifically asked too look at the w/s by an unknown SS official) on November 23rd and look at where he describes the crack - oh my!

[Patrick Jackson]

Regarding the "mud" on the tire sidewalls in the garage, I believe it might be an effect caused by the flash and camera angle.


There's a similar irregular "caked-on" pattern on the tire sidewall in the Weaver photo. Instead of flash, it's the way the sun angle is hitting the tire relative to the photographer.

Jerry, under no flash light or camera angle this can not be any effect or whatsoever. This can only be mud and nothing else.

[Patrick Jackson]

Clearly the first 3 photos don't show cracks. 

Picture bellow clearly show the crack.

This one also.

On a third picture we do not see the crack due to a camera angle but that does not prove the crack was not there.


The point is that all three pictures were take on the same spot and same time and they prove that the windshield in NARA is the same one as this one we are seeing in this there photos. And since it is absolutely the same, there is no hole in it.

Unless there were two absolutely identical limos switched between Algens 6 and Altgens 7.

Absolutely no doubt windshields are the same, no hole and the crack is outside. 

[Steve Howsley]

Absolutely no doubt windshields are the same, no hole and the crack is outside.

I agree Patrick but you can be sure this issue will be brought up again with people who should know better expressing the same astonishment and disbelief as if they have just uncovered irrefutable proof of evidence tampering. After almost 55 years of mining for clues and coming up empty handed you'd like to think the matter would be closed but that ain't gonna happen.   

[Howard Gee]

Serious question for the drooling conspiracy clowns....

How many windshields do you think the conspirators had to break before they managed to create a substitute planted windshield with the identical pattern of cracks seen on the original windshield ?

Think it over, droolers.

[Patrick Jackson]

I agree Patrick but you can be sure this issue will be brought up again with people who should know better expressing the same astonishment and disbelief as if they have just uncovered irrefutable proof of evidence tampering. After almost 55 years of mining for clues and coming up empty handed you'd like to think the matter would be closed but that ain't gonna happen.   

Thing is that some people will not believe it no matter what. If they would go to NARA and check personally and see there is no hole they will say it is not the same windshield. No matter what evidence to present, they will dispute them find the ways to extend the issue further more. I find there are two groups of people doing this, not believing to their own eyes: first group are those whose job is to lead us to a false stories, meaning there are government people here whose job is to make the truth unreachable and second group of people are those who do not want to admit they are/were wrong no matter what. They see with their own eyes but since they started pushing one story years ago, it is very hard for them to accept and admit they were wrong.
In any case, I think that the full truth will never be reached since it would destroy America. Just imagine what would happen if FBI, CIA, NSA admits 9/11 was inside job (I am not claiming it was)? People would get confused, stock would drop drastically and who knows what else can happen. No doubt there was one conspiracy in Dallas: to blame Oswald for everything no matter what.

[Howard Gee]

Thing is that some people will not believe it no matter what. If they would go to NARA and check personally and see there is no hole they will say it is not the same windshield. No matter what evidence to present, they will dispute them find the ways to extend the issue further more. I find there are two groups of people doing this, not believing to their own eyes: first group are those whose job is to lead us to a false stories, meaning there are government people here whose job is to make the truth unreachable and second group of people are those who do not want to admit they are/were wrong no matter what. They see with their own eyes but since they started pushing one story years ago, it is very hard for them to accept and admit they were wrong.
In any case, I think that the full truth will never be reached since it would destroy America. Just imagine what would happen if FBI, CIA, NSA admits 9/11 was inside job (I am not claiming it was)? People would get confused, stock would drop drastically and who knows what else can happen. No doubt there was one conspiracy in Dallas: to blame Oswald for everything no matter what.

Are you the same Patrick Jackson that theorized a 'blood cannon' was used to fake JFK's head exploding ?