....These three photos were taken in the same garage comparing the hat on the wall:
There is absolutely no doubt that this crack
is same as these cracks.
Question is in which garage the first three photos were taken?
photos were not taken at the same spot. Were they taken in the same garage?
Also, note the mud on the wheels, where did the mud came from, where did they drove the limo?....
Clearly the above 2 pictures with the cube van in the background are at different locations or the car was moved between photographs! Why was it moved or were photos taken at 2 different times? Or is it 2 different trucks with matching bumpers and cabs?
Clearly looking at this photo and comparing it to the rest, it should be clear that the film is different and so likely a different camera used indicating different cameraman and a different time and possibly different location.
These photos all certainly don't look like crime scene investigation photos and so become useless! The lighting is so poor that it relies on flash photography - can't even read a license plate, that is how clear they are!
As I said before, Ferguson created a statement for the SS on December 18 stating the position of the crack on the windshield which he was specifically called in to look at (the rest of car covered) doesn't match the crated windshield placement of crack whatsoever. Why not? This photo (can't even read the license plate) and doesn't show a crack unless you want to imagine it. I could point to the white spot located way below the mirror and infer that there is a bullet hole through and through as it looks like it! All ridiculous conclusions and not evidence of anything. To find a crack on Altgens pictures is also ridiculous in my opinion. People see what they want to see.
The only thing we know for sure is there is a crated windshield with a crack in it and the written statement taken on December 18th does not match it. Certainly if a cameraman accompanied Ferguson the first night, the car would have been covered with a canvas. So when were these pictures thrown in? As well, why take a distant photo with a door open on the car? The resolution of whatever they were trying to point out is beyond amateurish!
