Bullet hole in windshield on JFK's Limo

[John Iacoletti]

Clearly the first 3 photos don't show cracks.

Picture bellow clearly show the crack.

If two people say that opposite claims are "clear", then obviously it not clear.

[John Iacoletti]

I'm reposting to show the same windshield crack pattern... I did a Powerpoint 180 flip to match up to the Limo photo from 1963 (which I assume is what we see on the right side panel) - and also changed the angle on the Archives photo to try to match them up... There seem to be enough characteristics to say they are the same windshield, in my opinion.[/size]

They're either identical or they're not.  But when was your right side panel photo taken?

[John Iacoletti]

This photo (can't even read the license plate) and doesn't show a crack unless you want to imagine it.  I could point to the white spot located way below the mirror and infer that there is a bullet hole through and through as it looks like it!    All ridiculous conclusions and not evidence of anything.  To find a crack on Altgens pictures is also ridiculous in my opinion.  People see what they want to see.

[Patrick Jackson]

Are you the same Patrick Jackson that theorized a 'blood cannon' was used to fake JFK's head exploding ?

Yes, that is me, thank you for remembering.
About the sentence you have embolden, well, yes, it might be referred to me but the thing is that the person on autopsy photos is not JFK so exploding head is still not 100% proved so I still do not have to admit I am wrong.

[Mark Connors]

If two people say that opposite claims are "clear", then obviously it not clear.

Umm... no, not necessarily.

But, I'm not surprised that you would jump to that conclusion without "clearly" thinking it through.

 

[John Iacoletti]

Umm... no, not necessarily.

But, I'm not surprised that you would jump to that conclusion without "clearly" thinking it through.

 

Adding the word "clearly" to a subjective opinion doesn't turn it into a fact.

[Jerry Organ]

Jerry, under no flash light or camera angle this can not be any effect or whatsoever. This can only be mud and nothing else.

I'm not ready to dismiss the effect of flash, camera angle, the reflective properties of different materials and photo-quality.

low-res photos		"caked-on mud" on rear seat-back
better-resolution		better-resolution

"Caked-on mud" pattern on tire sidewalls similar to that on rear seat-back seams, on chrome trim, on side of jumpseats, etc. Seems consistent with flash and respective reflective properties. Wheel-well interiors light-in-tone anyway, so probably not mud.

[Mark Connors]

Adding the word "clearly" to a subjective opinion doesn't turn it into a fact.

lol

Spin and twist all you want.

You are intentionally dishonest with many of your posts. The fact that you think your subjective opinion is any more important is quite evident.