Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Martin Weidmann]

Yes, that was foolish of me.....

I should have followed through with my train of thought here....

When was the photo of the evidence taken?  Has anybody seen documentation for the time and date of the photo?

Since on Saturday morning the FBI reported that ...."The latent prints appearing in the photograph taken of the rifle K1 by the Dallas Police department are too fragmentary and indistinct to be of any value for identification purposes. Photographs of this weapon taken by this bureau also failed to produce prints of sufficient legibility for comparison purposes."

That means they had the evidence in their possession on Saturday 11 /23 /63 .... So the evidence had to have been released to them prior to Saturday morning.... And item number 14 on the evidence inventory list is  the "Partial palm print off underside of gunbarrel near end of foregrip" c2766.   

Yesterday I noticed something I hadn't seen before....On the Original evidence list "A" at the very bottom of the sheet it says....
"Paraffin test on Oswald, was positive on both hands and negative on face."

But on the altered evidence inventory list "B" that entry has been eliminated.....   I wonder ...WHY?  any idea?

"Paraffin test on Oswald, was positive on both hands and negative on face."

But on the altered evidence inventory list "B" that entry has been eliminated.....   I wonder ...WHY?  any idea?

Because the reverse was true and there could have been multiple explanations for the face being positive.

[Bill Chapman]

Walt, asking Chapman for his fascinations is like asking Gremlins what they want to eat after midnight....

Please don't go there!

And yet here you are

[Martin Weidmann]

And yet here you are

Did you say something?

[Bill Chapman]

Did you say something?

There you go again.
Just can't stay away from me, can you...

[Martin Weidmann]

There you go again.
Just can't stay away from me, can you...

Did you say something?

[John Iacoletti]

Since on Saturday morning the FBI reported that ...."The latent prints appearing in the photograph taken of the rifle K1 by the Dallas Police department are too fragmentary and indistinct to be of any value for identification purposes. Photographs of this weapon taken by this bureau also failed to produce prints of sufficient legibility for comparison purposes."

That means they had the evidence in their possession on Saturday 11 /23 /63 ....

This is just talking about prints appearing in photographs taken of the rifle.

[Jerry Freeman]

Oh, now I remember... it was Oswald's pubes that were green

Another irrelevant Chapman contribution

[Walt Cakebread]

This is just talking about prints appearing in photographs taken of the rifle.

Page 105 Of First Day Evidence....The latent prints appeared immediately while the rifle as being dusted on the sixth floor ....  This action was CAPTURED ON FILM by a news photographer who had been allowed on the sixth floor by police. 

We know the reporter was Tom Alyea.....  Have you ever seen the film?