Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer  (Read 439650 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2488 on: June 05, 2021, 12:21:59 PM »
Advertisement
Why the sudden confusion, genius?

Whaley mentions no jackets left in the cab, "Oswald" enters rooming house in shirt sleeves.

Carry on.

Is there a point about jackets that relates to me in there somewhere? Am I supposed to solve your pet theory?


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2488 on: June 05, 2021, 12:21:59 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2489 on: June 05, 2021, 12:28:57 PM »
There's no need to cast doubt, genius, it was on record 50+ years ago, like:

Mr. WHALEY. I never saw what they had in there. It was all written out by hand. The statement I saw, I think, was this one, and that could be writing. I might not even seen this one yet. I signed my name because they said that is what I said.

Evidently, Whaley has no clue WTF he signed and is trying a right to left count to make a #3 man in the affidavit work with the #2 man he told them.

Done deflecting?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2490 on: June 05, 2021, 06:21:25 PM »
I now very much doubt you would pass as a genius anywhere.

We have Whaley on record saying "Oswald" was dressed in two jackets, then enters the rooming house in shirt sleeves according to Earlene Roberts.

Looks like we're one jacket short if he exited wearing a jacket...

Looks like you're trying to make it look like I support Whaley's two-jacket thing. Looks like Whaley ID'd Oswald as the guy he hauled to 500 Beckley.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2021, 06:38:15 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2490 on: June 05, 2021, 06:21:25 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2491 on: June 05, 2021, 06:27:00 PM »
Our genius having problems counting right to left in a four man lineup?

Cite that. And your attempt at yet another ad-hom is duly noted.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2021, 06:27:37 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2492 on: June 05, 2021, 09:25:01 PM »
Go do that.

Nobody cares WTF you're noting.

Genius.

Typical CT bailout: "Nobody cares what you think/note/say/do"
Yet here you are.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2492 on: June 05, 2021, 09:25:01 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2493 on: June 05, 2021, 09:27:23 PM »
Just exemplifying how you have 'unsubscribe' written all over Whaley to keep your fantasy alive.

Like Bill Brown's inverse cherry picking, unpicking the jackets to prevent the WC narrative from sinking -- ROFL

Wrong, it looks like Whaley was screwed over by DPD, and you even missed the part where the 500 block was upgraded to 700, genius.

500 block was upgraded to 700
Cite that, in context

PS:

written all over Whaley to keep your fantasy alive.
No fantasy needed: Whaley ID'd Oswald.

And jacket #163 was found left behind in Oswald's place of work.
Seems Oswald was fond of leaving jackets behind that day.
And you sort are the type trucking in fantasies around here.
« Last Edit: June 05, 2021, 09:38:01 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2494 on: June 05, 2021, 10:09:32 PM »
500 block was upgraded to 700
Cite that, in context

PS:

written all over Whaley to keep your fantasy alive.
No fantasy needed: Whaley ID'd Oswald.

And jacket #163 was found left behind in Oswald's place of work.
Seems Oswald was fond of leaving jackets behind that day.
And you sort are the type trucking in fantasies around here.

And jacket #163 was found left behind in Oswald's place of work.
Seems Oswald was fond of leaving jackets behind that day.


Yes indeed.... for once you're right

Frazier saw Oswald wear a light grey jacket to Irving on Thursday evening. As he only had two jackets that light grey jacket can only have been CE 162, which he did indeed leave behind in Irving, where the cops most likely found it during the first search of Ruth Paine's house on Friday afternoon.

But wait, that means that Oswald couldn't have left the rooming house wearing a jacket, doesn't it? Just as I have been saying all along  Thumb1:

Offline Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3163
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2495 on: June 05, 2021, 10:51:38 PM »
And jacket #163 was found left behind in Oswald's place of work.
Seems Oswald was fond of leaving jackets behind that day.


Yes indeed.... for once you're right

Frazier saw Oswald wear a light grey jacket to Irving on Thursday evening. As he only had two jackets that light grey jacket can only have been CE 162, which he did indeed leave behind in Irving, where the cops most likely found it during the first search of Ruth Paine's house on Friday afternoon.

But wait, that means that Oswald couldn't have left the rooming house wearing a jacket, doesn't it? Just as I have been saying all along  Thumb1:

Mr. BALL - On Thursday afternoon when you went home, drove on home, did he carry any package with him?
Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; he didn't
Mr. BALL - Did he have a jacket or coat on him?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - What kind of a jacket or coat did he have?
Mr. FRAZIER - That, you know, like I say gray jacket.
Mr. BALL - That same gray jacket?
Mr. FRAZIER - Yes, sir. Now, I can be frank with you, I had seen him wear that jacket several times...

You'll accept Frazier's testimony that Oswald was wearing the light grey jacket to Irving on Thursday might but won't accept his testimony that he wore exactly the same jacket to work Friday morning.
Typical CT  BS:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #2495 on: June 05, 2021, 10:51:38 PM »