Contrarian mumbo jumbo. You interjected doubt of Oswald's ownership of the pistol into the discussion citing some alleged minor delay in logging it into evidence. Then you claim that you didn't say anything about anyone framing Oswald!! Unreal. If the pistol in evidence is not the same one that the DPD indicate they took from Oswald upon his arrest, then what exactly are you suggesting? Who switched the pistols? Who doctored all the documentation to link the pistol to Oswald/Hidell? And for what purpose would this be done except to frame Oswald for the murder of Tippit? And wouldn't that mean by implication that the DPD knew the identity of the real murderer (because they obtained his pistol) and decided to let him go free to put the blame on Oswald? Wouldn't all this fakery have to take place quickly since the evidence is documented within hours of Oswald's arrest? You have to own the implications of your own loony theories even if you don't like them.
Just plain mumbo jumbo. I'm getting a bit bored with your rants. Stop asking silly questions and telling me what I supposedly have claimed and start dealing with the actual evidence.
How do we know that the revolver now in evidence at the NA is the same revolver they took from Oswald?
A simple question, so try to answer it for once instead of posting another rant.
some alleged minor delay in logging it into evidence.OK this is definitely going to make the all time favorite top 10 of oversimplifications...