Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Bill Chapman]

The intent of the design is clear.

Indeed. It's to post things you don't agree with. It has been my pleasure to point that out and thus confirm it.

From now on, we can all assume that you mean the opposite of what you post. Good to know! 

Keep assuming.

The intent of the design is abundantly clear: Mockery.
There. Consider yourself schooled. Again.

[Martin Weidmann]

Keep assuming.

The intent of the design is abundantly clear: Mockery.
There. Consider yourself schooled. Again.

There. Consider yourself schooled. Again.

As we now know that you post things you don't agree with, there's nothing really there for me to consider....

[Martin Weidmann]

After running away from the discussion in this thread, once he completed the ad hom attack below;

Oh dear.
It's only just dawned on me how far gone you are.
This is one of the most Tinfoil things I've ever come across.

So somebody immediately contacted Roberts' friend from Parkland Hospital to tell her that JFK was dead??
 
Long before any of the networks were aware of it Roberts' neighbour had the scoop??
 
And the first thing this woman thought to do was ring Earlene Roberts with the news??
 

Once I'd pointed out you were destroying your own tinfoil, ill-conceived, tatty theory with your insistence that Roberts' friend had used the word "killed" instead of "shot" anyone with a grain of common sense would've held their hands up to the mistake. But not the truly Tinfoil who forge ahead into ever deeper and darker folly.

It's clear you don't have the wit to be embarrassed by your own buffoonery and I feel embarrassed I've wasted so much time on you.
It won't be happening in future.

"Unlike you, I just try to follow the evidence and am not trying to create an alternate reality."

 

it seems Danny has now opened up the "discussion" again in another thread;

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2925.20.html

with an out of context quote and another ad hom attack....

Does he perhaps think his bogus arguments will go down better in this thread or did he quitely hope that I would not notice. Or perhaps both? Who knows, but it's kinda funny..... 

[Bill Chapman]

There. Consider yourself schooled. Again.

As we now know that you post things you don't agree with, there's nothing really there for me to consider....

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

But keep twisting. It's very entertaining.

[Martin Weidmann]

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

But keep twisting. It's very entertaining.

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

Who is mocking me? What are you on about, Mr "my friends call me 'genius' and I don't even understand the irony in that"?

[Bill Chapman]

Yet you have repeatedly been quoting Whaley for picking the #2 man.

So let's try again:

The name of the #2 man was?

But that wouldn't be ID'ing the man, would it?

Is that so?

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum.

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum
They'll love the graphic ideas, the hard-hitting concepts. Guaranteed.

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.
Yeah, you keep repeating that. Yet here you are.

The name of the #2 man was?
Ask Whaley. He was the guy who hauled the killer to Beckley. And I see you're messing with my blue box (bolding text that I did not bolden)
N'uh... don't do that. Bubba. But while I'm at it, you conveniently avoided bolding Whaley's "But he was the man that I carried in my taxicab"

Is that so?
Yeah, that's so. Now don't get me started on my talent on the sporting field, where I also had tons of compliments whether on the baseball diamond or  tennis court but especially as a hockey player.
Well, ok. ok.. I'll provide some proof:

[Martin Weidmann]

But I suggest not showing them your "contributions" on this forum
They'll love the graphic ideas, the hard-hitting concepts. Guaranteed.

To correct this misunderstanding: I don't give a fxck.
Yeah, you keep repeating that. Yet here you are.

The name of the #2 man was?
Ask Whaley. He was the guy who hauled the killer to Beckley. And I see you're messing with my blue box (bolding text that I did not bolden)
N'uh... don't do that. Bubba. But while I'm at it, you conveniently avoided bolding Whaley's "But he was the man that I carried in my taxicab"

Is that so?
Yeah, that's so. Now don't get me started on my talent on the sporting field, where I also had tons of compliments whether on the baseball diamond or  tennis court but especially as a hockey player.
Well, ok. ok.. I'll provide some proof:

Your desperation to "prove" yourself to others is getting beyond ridiculous.



Are you the only person in the world that's called Bill Chapman (if that's even your real name)?

If not, so much for your "proof".

[Bill Chapman]

Keep dodging the fact that you cannot stand being mocked.

Who is mocking me? What are you on about, Mr "my friends call me 'genius' and I don't even understand the irony in that"?

Point out where I said my friends call me 'genius