Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[John Iacoletti]

For the umpteenth time answer the question, who said that the lineups were unbiased and unfair.
And btw using some recommendations from somewhere else decades later is a waste of my time.

You waste everybody's time regurgitating the same old mountain of nonsense.  Those recommendations for making lineups as unbiased and fair as possible demonstrate that the lineups that were done were biased, unfair, and therefore unreliable and invalid.

[John Mytton]

"Oswald playing with his murder weapon".  Are you looking to replace Walt for the title of biggest fabricator?

 Awesome yeah, how to get away with murder the Iacoletti way.

1. Ignore all the eyewitnesses who positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
2. Ignore that Oswald dropped shells that matched his revolver.
3. Ignore all those eyewitnesses who said that Lee Harvey Oswald was wearing his light grey/tan jacket.
4. Ignore the same eyewitnesses who said Lee Harvey Oswald was carrying his weapon.
5. Ignore that Oswald ducked into a shop front to avoid Police.
5. Ignore that Oswald hid in a Theater.
6. Ignore that when arrested Oswald tried to kill more Cops.
7. Ignore that Oswald said that he was carrying a revolver.

WOW!



JohnM

[John Mytton]

You waste everybody's time regurgitating the same old mountain of nonsense.  Those recommendations for making lineups as unbiased and fair as possible demonstrate that the lineups that were done were biased, unfair, and therefore unreliable and invalid.

For goodness sakes anyone can make up recommendations, even you but that is only someones POV and means nothing, either you can prove that the lineups were unfair or you can't and so far you can't!



JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

Scoggins did not see Tippit being shot.

Poor dumb cop

[Howard Gee]

I can believe the lineups were unfair.

I also believe that eyewitnesses are frequently wrong or unreliable.

But when you combine mountains of physical evidence with loads of corroborating eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence, there's only one conclusion that can be reached....

LEE HARVEY OSWALD MURDERED OFFICER TIPPIT

[Walt Cakebread]

I can believe the lineups were unfair.

I also believe that eyewitnesses are frequently wrong or unreliable.

But when you combine mountains of physical evidence with loads of corroborating eyewitness testimony and circumstantial evidence, there's only one conclusion that can be reached....

LEE HARVEY OSWALD MURDERED OFFICER TIPPIT

That would be true.....IF you could provide the mountains of physical evidence to support your contention.

P.S.  How did Lee Oswald appear in two different places at he same time?

At 1:04 pm Mrs Roberts saw Lee standing on the side walk in front of the rooming house at 1026 N. Beckley.

At 1:04 pm  Helen Markham saw Officer JD Tippit tailing a man who was walking east on 10th street.....

[John Iacoletti]

Awesome yeah, how to get away with murder the Iacoletti way.

1. Ignore all the eyewitnesses who positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
2. Ignore that Oswald dropped shells that matched his revolver.
3. Ignore all those eyewitnesses who said that Lee Harvey Oswald was wearing his light grey/tan jacket.
4. Ignore the same eyewitnesses who said Lee Harvey Oswald was carrying his weapon.
5. Ignore that Oswald ducked into a shop front to avoid Police.
5. Ignore that Oswald hid in a Theater.
6. Ignore that when arrested Oswald tried to kill more Cops.
7. Ignore that Oswald said that he was carrying a revolver.

WOW!



JohnM

How to railroad a suspect the Mytton way.

1. Rig an unfair lineup and coerce and intimidate the witnesses into picking who you want.
2. Allow what little evidence there is to be collected, documented, and handled with no controls.
3. Pretend that the color of a jacket that can't even be proven to belong to your suspect is evidence of murder.
4. Pretend that carrying a firearm proves that you just murdered a cop.
5. Pretend that you can read minds and know why a guy went into the display area of a shoe store.
5. Have two number 5s in your list for no apparent reason.
6. Pretend that watching a movie in a theater that nobody even saw you enter means you just killed a cop.
7. Illegally search, beat up and arrest a man for murder based on no probable cause other than that he looked funny to a shoe salesman.  Then cover your ass by lying about the suspect trying to kill cops based on somebody hearing a clicking sound when several hands were on a gun.
8. Don't document or record an interrogation in any way until days later and then do it from memory.  Then conveniently ignore that the suspect said that he had a revolver that he bought in Fort Worth. Then lie about it and say that Oswald admitted carrying the gun identified as the murder weapon solely based on some empty shells that were handed to the cops by civilians rather than being recovered and documented at the crime scene.  Then pretend like it doesn't matter that a cop said he initialed them, but his initials are not on the shells.

[John Iacoletti]

For goodness sakes anyone can make up recommendations, even you but that is only someones POV and means nothing, either you can prove that the lineups were unfair or you can't and so far you can't!

You heard it here first.  Some yahoo in Australia knows more about fair lineups in the United States than the Unites States Department of Justice.  That's just somebody's unproveable point of view, but when an utter screwball says "number 2 is the one I picked" after saying six times that she didn't recognize anybody in the lineup and after being led with "was there a number 2 man in there", well, that's not just somebody's unproveable point of view, that's "evidence".