Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Bill Chapman]

I didn't know who passed the puck to me on a goal I scored one day.

This explains a lot..... it answers many questions about your mental problem....   You've had your little brain rattled a few too many times....

Time for your nap, Waldo
Eat your cookie and drink your milk

And take your meds

[John Iacoletti]

BFD. Carroll did.

Some people think it?s a big deal not to make false claims about the case. Pity that you don?t

Back in the day, I didn't know who passed the puck to me on a goal I scored one day. It was in the middle of a melee near the net. Well the guy who passed it did. The referee confirmed it.

But nothing will ever be confirmed in your universe. You'd call that referee a liar.

 If the puck was evidence in a murder case that relied on a solid chain of custody for its provenance, then maybe it would matter. What if a spectator threw the puck out on the ice and you scored off it?

[John Iacoletti]

Still waiting for your killer and conspiracy to show up

Guessing doesn't count

Apparently guessing does count when you do it.

[Bill Chapman]

Apparently guessing does count when you do it.

Waiting for your killer and conspiracy to show up

Tick-tock, tick-tock

[Bill Chapman]

Some people think it?s a big deal not to make false claims about the case. Pity that you don?t
>>> Lets see a specific example. Some people have to be on the scene at every turn; otherwise everything is faked, planted or altered.

If the puck was evidence in a murder case that relied on a solid chain of custody for its provenance, then maybe it would matter. What if a spectator threw the puck out on the ice and you scored off it?
>>> You missed my point (melee on ice/melee in TT).

[John Iacoletti]

Waiting for your killer and conspiracy to show up

Tick-tock, tick-tock

Why?  Because otherwise your guess automatically wins?

[John Iacoletti]

Some people think it?s a big deal not to make false claims about the case. Pity that you don?t
>>> Lets see a specific example. Some people have to be on the scene at every turn; otherwise everything is faked, planted or altered.

If the puck was evidence in a murder case that relied on a solid chain of custody for its provenance, then maybe it would matter. What if a spectator threw the puck out on the ice and you scored off it?
>>> You missed my point (melee on ice/melee in TT).

Actually you missed the point.  That was a specific example.  Mitch claimed, "Carroll testified that he seized the weapon from McDonald's hand during the scuffle, which McDonald's testimony corroborates."

McDonald testimony does not corroborate Carroll seizing a weapon from him.  The claim is false.

[Bill Chapman]

Why?  Because otherwise your guess automatically wins?

My dad could beat up your dad