Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Rob Caprio]

Well said, Dale.

The last seven pages of this thread should be deleted.

Since you have provided no supporting evidence for your accusation in the OP title you should change the title. Or admit that you just accuse people of murder with no supporting evidence. That is the height of being disrespectful.

[Rob Caprio]

I don't know which argument is more lame...

Claiming that the jacket could not have been Oswald's because it was a size Medium and Oswald wore a size Small.

Or...

Claiming that Tippit's killer could not have been Oswald because Benavides said the killer's hairline was squared instead of tapered, even though the killer was wearing a jacket with a collar.

Says the guy who can't put LHO at Tenth and Patton let alone shooting JDT.

[Rob Caprio]

Using the DPD image, the jacket collar could easily have blocked out the taper leaving the thinner sides in view, giving a squared-off appearance.

Your star witness, Helen Markham, said that the shooter had "bushy hair" and LHO did not have bushy hair.

[Rob Caprio]

I've opined that buying a larger size jacket would give the little twerp a larger appearance... like in the wild where animals will make themselves appear as big as possible when facing a foe. Or looking to get a little somethin'-somethin' 

This is just a distraction as the *official evidence* shows that a WHITE jacket was found. LHO did not own a white jacket.

[John Iacoletti]

Straw man.

Feel free to provide any actual evidence that the white jacket allegedly found in the parking lot was a gray jacket belonging to Oswald.

[Bill Chapman]

This is just a distraction as the *official evidence* shows that a WHITE jacket was found. LHO did not own a white jacket.

Post those images

[Walt Cakebread]

Your star witness, Helen Markham, said that the shooter had "bushy hair" and LHO did not have bushy hair.

I believe that Domingo Benavides was a far more lucid and rational witness than Markham.... And Benavides descrided the killer's hira cut as in a manner that indicated that he had taken note of the man's hair....Whereas Markham simply said that the man's hair was kinda bushy, or wind blown....   

[Rob Caprio]

Post those images

Another distraction. You continually ignore the actual evidence so why should anyone take you seriously?