Whenever you're struggling out comes a wall of words as if more words are going to save you.
This case involves a massive amount of information, yet you prefer to deal with it telegram style?
Typical circle logic from Weidmann, take a small handful of cherry picked eyewitnesses, and again manipulate it so Saint Oswald can be innocent whereas the intelligent researchers like the majority of LNers look at the entire picture and evaluate ALL the evidence. Just look at Markham, you ridicule her for her Positive Identification of Lee Harvey Oswald being the cold blooded murderer of J.D.Tippit and her subsequent grilling by the WC, yet you use her time guesses as Gospel and let's face it, you don't trust the official Police time to be accurate so what chance does a "screwball" have? Your own interpretation and the way you evaluate of the evidence destroys you and makes you look the Fool.
take a small handful of cherry picked eyewitnesses, and again manipulate it Hang on, that's what the WC did....
the intelligent researchers like the majority of LNers look at the entire picture and evaluate ALL the evidence.You are cracking me up... Let's just wait and see where you go with this......
Like ALL the others her time was a guess, she was watching the TV and trying to learn about her President, so Oswald at that precise time would be just another bug on the wall.
Indeed. You've just destroyed any credibility Earleen Roberts ever had. And by doing so you have proven the point I was making!
Ironic and interesting at the same time as it shows clearly that Mytton wil go any length to make even the most worthless point rather than dealing with the factual information he doesn't like.You will throw anybody under the bus if it somehow serves your purpose, right John?
Here we go, your cherry picked eyewitnesses one whose watch was never tested and the other "screwball" was making a "bet" on what time it was? WTF?, Absolutely Pathetic!.
Oh boy, whatever happened to "we look at all the evidence"? Dismissing evidence you don't like outright is really your thing, isn't it Johnny?
Let's try to go baby steps here; John, do you agree that Bowley arrived at 10th/Patton after Markham saw Tippit being shot?
Here we go again, the self serving assumption flight has reached maximum altitude, your using of google maps to estimate a cars travelling time is completely pointless and doesn't take into account 55 years of changes. Your 16 minute time is based on a specifically built Toll road, was that there in 1963? And you don't seem to remember that there was just a small event at Love Field.
Now who is the one assuming stuff?
Me using google maps = assumption and wrong, as I actually drove the distance during my last visit to Dallas!
the 16 minute time is based on a specifically toll road = assumption, I never said anything about the route I drove
And the small event at Love Field was over when Scoggings picked up his client at 12:35.
You liar, Scoggins says "I would say 10, 12, 15 minutes" just like all the others the President was just shot and people were in a state of shock. Anyway looking at Scoggins, his time guess is within a 5 minute range and his Tippit guess was just 5 minutes off, go figure.
Scoggins did indeed say 10,12,15 minutes, but when I said "it could have been 5, 10 or 15 minutes" I wasn't quoting him. I was talking about him not being able to say how long he was at the club. Not that it matters much. It still shows that Scoggins wasn't sure at all about the times!
Btw, his Tippit guess was only "just 5 minutes off" if you believe Tippit was shot at 1.15 and if you assume that Scoggins did indeed arrive at the Club at the time he estimated. That's looking for "evidence" in support of a predetermined conclusion!
Weidmann, if you want to present a successful argument, remember what you have said in the past because it's going to come back and bite you on the arse.
JohnM
First of all, you are a die hard LN fanatic who will never ever be able to accept any argument that does not agree with your own opinion. Even if Tippit could come back from the grave and tell you somebody else killed him, I have no doubt you will instantly call him a liar. That's your nature... an arrogant know it all.
Btw, you haven't mentioned anything I have said in the past. In fact, I have no clue what you are going on about, but then jibberish is frequently your choice of language!
Now, let's get back to what you said earlier;
the intelligent researchers like the majority of LNers look at the entire picture and evaluate ALL the evidence.So, why did you fail completely to look at the entire picture I presented in the Markham/Bowley/Methodist Hospital/Davenport timeline? Let me guess, it's far easier to dismiss everything by claiming it were all estimates, whilst at the same time rather hypocritically blindly accepting Scroggins flawed time estimates.
You look at the entire picture alright.....