Lee Oswald The Cop Killer

[Richard Smith]

I take it that means that you have never walked or run the distance between Beckley and 10th street.

If Tippit was indeed killed at 1:14 (quod non), Oswald would only have had 10 minutes or so at to walk the distance and even that would be cutting it close.
If Tippit was actually killed between 1:06 and 1:10, as the evidence suggests, there is no way Oswald could have been there, at least not on foot.

Brilliant logic.  Oswald was seen at the boardinghouse.  Then he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  But we are told "there is no way Oswald could have been there."  Wow.  Only a person in the legal profession could make that argument.  Once a thing has happened, the odds against it happening become moot.  They are trumped by reality.   Multiple witnesses place Oswald at the Tippit scene.  He was there whether he walked or strapped jet engines to his backside.   All the debarred defense attorney arguments in the world don't change the facts.

[Martin Weidmann]

Brilliant logic.  Oswald was seen at the boardinghouse.  Then he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  But we are told "there is no way Oswald could have been there."  Wow.  Only a person in the legal profession could make that argument.  Once a thing has happened, the odds against it happening become moot.  They are trumped by reality.   Multiple witnesses place Oswald at the Tippit scene.  He was there whether he walked or strapped jet engines to his backside.   All the debarred defense attorney arguments in the world don't change the facts.

Says the legal eagle who relies on bogus biased line ups by eyewitnesses who, as any competent lawyer knows, provide the least reliable evidence.

Since none of the witnesses were ever cross-examined by a defense lawyer, only an idiot would take their word as gospel.

Richard doesn't seem to understand that in a murder investigation all sorts of people say all sorts of things. When an investigator finds that a particular person could not have been at the crime scene, it only means that the witness was wrong or mistaken....... You know, like all those witnesses who were wrong at DP!

Btw, misquoting me doesn't really make your "argument" any more convincing.

[John Iacoletti]

Brilliant logic.  Oswald was seen at the boardinghouse.  Then he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  But we are told "there is no way Oswald could have been there."  Wow.  Only a person in the legal profession could make that argument.  Once a thing has happened, the odds against it happening become moot.  They are trumped by reality.   Multiple witnesses place Oswald at the Tippit scene.  He was there whether he walked or strapped jet engines to his backside.   All the debarred defense attorney arguments in the world don't change the facts.

Another one of “Richard’s” legendary circular arguments. Oswald was there because Oswald was there.

[John Iacoletti]

Btw, misquoting me doesn't really make your "argument" any more convincing.

That’s why he’s called Strawman “Smith”.

[Jerry Freeman]

   Then he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  But we are told "there is no way Oswald could have been there." 

  WE ARE TOLD that he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  BUT WE CAN SEE THAT-- there is no way Oswald could have been there.
Tell the story right.
 

[Bill Brown]

Says the legal eagle who relies on bogus biased line ups by eyewitnesses who, as any competent lawyer knows, provide the least reliable evidence.

Since none of the witnesses were ever cross-examined by a defense lawyer, only an idiot would take their word as gospel.

Richard doesn't seem to understand that in a murder investigation all sorts of people say all sorts of things. When an investigator finds that a particular person could not have been at the crime scene, it only means that the witness was wrong or mistaken....... You know, like all those witnesses who were wrong at DP!

Btw, misquoting me doesn't really make your "argument" any more convincing.

Btw, misquoting me doesn't really make your "argument" any more convincing.

Pot meet kettle.

[Jerry Freeman]

Thanks Jerry but unfortunately for you, you've proved the opposite of what you think. Your Methodist recollection states that were trying to bring Tippit back to life, so Tippit must be already dead when he arrived therefore the time of death happened at an earlier time. And the doctors established that the time of death was when he was shot and died instantly at 1:15.

I don't know why it is "unfortunate" for me. Must Mr Mytton be so pompous? According to the recorded document... This Dr Liquori had pronounced Tippit dead at 1:00 which was changed to 1:15 by someone [obviously not happy with the 1:00 time restriction] Making "Oswald The Cop Killer" an impossibility. A retarded person can see that the actual death had to precede the pronouncement by several minutes. So what is "unfortunate" is that John Mytton is too stubborn to accept reality---------> The entire opening post of this thread is based on a fallacious belief.
In case everybody missed it.......

[Walt Cakebread]

  WE ARE TOLD that he is seen at the Tippit murder scene.  BUT WE CAN SEE THAT-- there is no way Oswald could have been there.
Tell the story right.

LNer's have trouble dealing with FACTS..... After all, their bible is the Warren Report, and their religion is  The U.S.Government, with the main Church The capitol building.