The Magic Bullet

[Bill Brown]

LOL The bullet would have hit his hands.

Only if you actually believe that the bullet that hit him in the back exited through his throat.

What do YOU believe? 

[Bill Chapman]

Only if you actually believe that the bullet that hit him in the back exited through his throat.

Junction of back/neck..

[Gary Craig]

[Bill Chapman]

From the Clark Panel Report:

The possibility that the path of the bullet through the neck might have been more satisfactorily explored by the insertion of a finger or probe was considered. Obviously the cutaneous wound in the back was too small to permit the insertion of a finger. The insertion of a metal probe would have carried the risk of creating a false passage in part, because of the changed relationship of muscles at the time of autopsy and in part because of the existence of postmortem rigidity. Although the precise path of the bullet could undoubtedly have been demonstrated by complete dissection of the soft tissue between the two cutaneous wounds, there is no reason to believe that the information disclosed thereby would alter significantly the conclusions expressed in this report.

[Gary Craig]

John F Kennedy - The Autopsy

[Gary Craig]

From the Clark Panel Report:

The possibility that the path of the bullet through the neck might have been more satisfactorily explored by the insertion of a finger or probe was considered. Obviously the cutaneous wound in the back was too small to permit the insertion of a finger. The insertion of a metal probe would have carried the risk of creating a false passage in part, because of the changed relationship of muscles at the time of autopsy and in part because of the existence of postmortem rigidity. Although the precise path of the bullet could undoubtedly have been demonstrated by complete dissection of the soft tissue between the two cutaneous wounds, there is no reason to believe that the information disclosed thereby would alter significantly the conclusions expressed in this report.

"Although the precise path of the bullet could undoubtedly have been demonstrated by complete dissection of the soft tissue between the two cutaneous wounds, there is no reason to believe that the information disclosed thereby would alter significantly the conclusions expressed in this report."

Agreed!

Nothing the Clark Panel found would have changed their agreement with the official LN narrative.

Their job, like the WC, was to close doors not open them.

[Allan Fritzke]

Phil Willis put a time stamp on the first shot by clicking the shutter on his camera when the sound

of that shot startled him. A shot at Z-223 would require a second gunman as you well know the

alleged murder weapon couldn't be physically fired quickly enough to be responsible for both.

You have a choice here - either the Zapruder Film is the accepted version of the chain of events in the assassination and this one is false.   Or vice versa!  I believe the film taken by Zapruder was real - this was not!    How they worked this over to get the umbrella man below sign level and behind - I have no idea.  It is just misinformation!  Come on guys - look at reality.  Where do you get a correlation between an umbrella midway up the sign and to the front with those from Phil Willis - No correlation whatsoever!  Not even close!!  So, accept the film from Zapruder ($150,000 pay out) or say it is totally false.  Your choice as there is a conflict - actually lots of conflicts when comparing to all the other supposed camera shots of the day - none of which were worth money but surfaced much later!

[John Anderson]

Camera angles can be misleading.