AND How would they have known to make up and describe a package that was very similar to the package foun in the SN?
Translation for newbies:'We declare that Lee Harvey Oswald murdered the President based solely on his lying about the contents of the bag. The prosecution rests"Are you sure any LNer is claiming that?
This leads to a reasonable conclusion that there were no curtain rods in the package and that Oswald lied about it. No. It tells us that did not wish to reveal the contents of the package. I am unable to conceive of any innocent reason why an innocent Oswald would lie about the contents of this package. But he did. The only reason for lying about its contents was a non-innocent one. His gun then turns out to be a murder weapon. Hmmm. Let me see. Why did he not tell Frazier what was in the package. hmmm. Tough one.....
Randall first impression was that the bag was approx 3 x 6
It wasn't very similar to the package supposedly found in the SN.
Where do you get that from?
Different size, different length, different paper.
Where do you get those from?
Correction: James Bookhout reported that Randle stated that. She never stated that in her testimony, or in a signed affidavit, or in any recorded interview.
