He did not have an apartment and the room he was renting on N. Beckley already had curtains and blinds. Why do you think he needed curtain rods?
I don't know if he needed them or not. Maybe he just wanted new ones. Maybe the ones that were there were broken and the story about a news reporter breaking them was contrived to explain an inconvenient photo.
Sorry. Earlene Roberts or Gladys Johnson would have had to have given permission.
Why would they have "had to have given permission"? Have you seen the lease?
The "urgency" is evident from the fact that went to Irving on a Thursday night. He was normally going to go to Irving for the weekend. He needed them for Friday, rather than Monday. And he would not be in his room on the weekend as he would be in Irving. Again, why?
I don't see how that makes anything "urgent".
This, along with all the other evidence, tends to support the conclusion that he went to Irving to get his gun.
No it doesn't. You're assuming that he went to Irving to get his gun and then interpreting his actions under that light. There's no evidence that he ever got a gun.
Mary Bledsoe saw Oswald on the bus, minutes after the assassination, and did not mention that he was carrying anything.
Does that mean he couldn't have been carrying anything? Does that mean he couldn't have taken something with him when he left and dropped it somewhere else, given it to somebody, left it at the bus station, or any number of other possibilities?
That was my original point. He was carrying a longish package in which he lied about its contents and you cling to the discrepancy of a few inches from what Buell Frazier estimated to be its length, even though he admitted he didn't pay much attention to it.
How do you know he lied about the contents when you don't know what the contents were or even exactly what he said about it? The answer is, you don't.
Marina's evidence is not evidence?
Marina saw a part of a wooden stock that she took to be a rifle rolled up in a blanket in early October. How is that evidence that the C2766 rifle was in the Paine's garage on 11/21-22?
The blanket fibres are not evidence?
Evidence of what? 3 fibers that couldn't be tied to any specific blanket?
The backyard photos are not evidence?
Evidence of what. That Oswald was holding a rifle that may or may not have been C2766 in a photo taken in March or April?
The paper trail to and from Klein's is not evidence?
Evidence of what? That unscientific handwriting analysis of 2 block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon was claimed to have been written by Oswald?
The "A.J.Hidell" identity card found on Oswald is not evidence?
Evidence of what? That an ID card that nobody ever mentioned in any report or interview prior to Oswald's death suddenly turned up in the evidence stream?
It is a reasonable inference from the evidence that we have. An assumption is a fact that is accepted as being true without proof. An inference is a conclusion of fact that is based on indirect proof: ie. evidence and a logical thought process. You seem to be confusing the two concepts.
No,
you are confusing the two concepts as everything you're claiming to be evidence doesn't actually support your claim that "his gun was taken to the TSBD from the Paine's garage". You're accepting that as true without proof.
