If he actually had curtain rods, why would he not take them home?
I have no idea. I'm merely objecting to your assertion that Oswald didn't carry any package out of the TSBD when you don't actually know that to be true.
Oswald denied he had curtain rods. Why would he say that if he actually had curtain rods?
I don't know. I don't even know that he ever said this. But let's say that he actually told Frazier that he had curtain rods and actually told Fritz that he never told Frazier that. How do you get from that to he had a C2766 rifle in a bag?
If Buell Frazier and Linnie Mae Randall did not collude to fabricate their evidence, then Oswald lied about the curtain rods. So you are essentially saying that BF/LMR lied.
No not really. It could be Fritz who was lying/mistaken/confused in his recollection several days later about what Oswald said during interrogation. Besides, Linnie Mae wouldn't have had any independent knowledge that Oswald ever said anything to Frazier about curtain rods.
So I guess they were in on the conspiracy to assassinate JFK.
That's another giant leap. Oswald may or may not have been carrying curtain rods. He may or may not have lied to Frazier about what was in the package. Where's the evidence of murder?
That does not explain Oswald's behaviour in leaving the TSBD
Lots of people left the TSBD.
getting his gun,
You don't know that either.
killing Officer Tippit,
Or that.
and pulling his gun in the Texas Theater
That's just plain false -- even by McDonald's account.
and saying "It's all over now".
Nobody but McDonald ever claimed to have heard him say that.
Oh, right, you don't believe that evidence so it is not evidence - just assumptions.
They are all assumptions. And none of those assumptions get you to who killed JFK anyway.
By itself, it is not conclusive. But there is evidence that Oswald owned only one rifle and no evidence that he owned more than one rifle.
That's not true. There's evidence that Oswald owned a rifle in the Soviet Union (Marina's affidavit as translated by Mamantov). What evidence leads you to believe that he owned only one rifle in the US? Just because Marina didn't see or mention more than one? She didn't know a rifle from a shotgun.
So if she saw a rifle stock, that is evidence that tends to show that Oswald's rifle was there.
IF she saw a rifle stock. She just assumed that it was a rifle stock that she saw.
The paper trail linking C2766 to Oswald via his mail box
Where is the evidence that such a package was ever sent through the US mail and delivered to that PO box? Where's the evidence that Lee Oswald picked up such a package from that PO box?
and his use of the A.J. Hidell ID card is evidence that Oswald's rifle was the C2766 rifle.
Where is the evidence that he ever
used this ID card?
The back-yard photos are consistent with Oswald holding a gun that is identical to C2766 in every respect.
How did you determine that they are identical in
every respect?
Add to that the behaviour of Oswald subsequent to the assassination and you can conclude, quite reasonably, that Oswald was involved in the assassination. Oh, right, you don't believe that evidence so it is not evidence - just assumptions.
I believe that this evidence exists, I just don't think the conclusions you are making
about the evidence is sound. And for good reason.
What evidence is there that he owned or possessed another rifle? Marina said it was the same rifle that he used to shoot at Gen. Walker.
She did? When? How did she determine that?
Oh, right, you don't believe that evidence so it is not evidence - just assumptions. You believe the evidence to be false. You believe the police and FBI were all in on an enormous conspiracy. I don't. Let's leave it at that.
When did I ever say that the police and FBI were all in on an enormous conspiracy?
