A different picture taken at a different time from a different angle is supposed to prove this? But either way, Bill's attempt to mock and belittle Jean Hill for this falls flat. It looks like it could be a little white dog.
Hypocrite. What falls flat is you completely ignoring what Jean Hill said about not seeing a shooter in 1964 (just heard a shot) then years later her saying she saw the shooter firing while standing near a tree.
Jean Hill: The Lady in Red
Cite McAdams
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/[Excerpt]
A little more than an hour after the shooting, on the afternoon of the assassination, she was interviewed by WBAP-TV. (See right. Hill is on the left in the picture, and her friend Mary Moorman, who was standing next to Hill on the Dealey Plaza infield, is on the right).
Q. "Did you see the person who fired the . . ."
A. "No . . . I didn't see any person fire the weapon . . ."
Q. "You only heard it?"
A. "I only heard it."
And in an interview with Jim Marrs in the late '80s she told him 'I saw a man fire from behind the wooden fence. I saw a puff of smoke and some sort of movement on the Grassy Knoll where he was'
Yeah, that's consistent. Great witness.
