The Magic Bullet

[Jerry Freeman]

Jerry seems to be conceding that the trajectory of the SBT isn't impossible.

Not really
 

 

[Jack Trojan]

I see we're making some progress.

Jerry seems to be conceding that the trajectory of the SBT isn't impossible.

That's a start.

Naturally, once the droolers are shown that the trajectory of the SBT isn't impossible, the next step is to show that a bullet could cause the wounds and emerge relatively intact.

Jerry knows that 399 didn't 'come out looking brand new', so we'll let that go.

Rather, we will demonstrate that a single bullet could indeed cause all the wounds and emerge relatively intact. That is to say, not fragmented, nose not smashed, and not tremendously mangled as the detractors of the SBT insist would have to be the case.

I submit that the documentary 'Beyond The Magic Bullet' does just that.

If anyone can provide a better re-enactment of the SBT, I'd love to see it.

Impossible trajectory ?  Objection overruled.

Impossible to cause the wounds and not be mangled ?  Objection overruled.

The Court finds that the SBT is not only possible, it's the best explanation available !

Judge Gee has ruled.

Next case, please.

You've got this all backwards. It doesn't matter who claims the SBT is impossible because you can't prove a negative. The MB could have deflected off of JFK's spine and out a small hole in his throat then tumbled into Connally, I suppose, but you guys are insisting the MB passed thru JFK without hitting bone and you contend there is a straight line path thru JFK and into Connally's body. So the onus is on YOU to show the magical trajectory was possible using lasers and a re-enactment. Until then, the MB may not be impossible, but you need to be a LNer to believe in magic.

[Tim Nickerson]

Because you can't prove a negative. Try to keep up.

And you claim to be a physicist?   

http://www3.canisius.edu/~moleski/proof/provenegs.htm#egprovneg

[Jerry Freeman]

Found a sketch that Dr McClelland did a little over a year ago [from memory of course]

[Gary Craig]

Found a sketch that Dr McClelland did a little over a year ago [from memory of course]

 

[Jack Trojan]

And you claim to be a physicist?   

http://www3.canisius.edu/~moleski/proof/provenegs.htm#egprovneg

Yes I am and I'm not sure why you guys keep reminding me. If you are talking about proving trivial claims like there is no elephant in my pocket, then yes you can prove many non-sensical claims like that, but non-trivial claims can only be proven using a null hypothesis, which is not appropriate for proving claims such as Santa doesn't exist.

So how would I prove that the magic bullet was impossible? By showing you every possible combination/orientation of how it wasn't possible for me? Would that convince you? Get real. Sorry, in this case, you can't prove a negative because no one can disprove something by failing to prove it true. But you can prove that it was possible by doing the 2 laser experiment and shoving the results down my throat. So get on that.

The best evidence (not proof) that the MB was not possible is the fact that not a single LNer has demonstrated that it was possible when it is so easy to do so. Otherwise, where's the beef?

And yes, I do have an elephant in my pocket. 

[Gary Craig]

[Jerry Freeman]

Why should we believe The Magic Bull[sh]it Theory?
Senator Richard Russell said he didn't believe it and LBJ agreed...That's right -President Johnson said he didn't believe it either.
Don't believe it?........