And if you want to observe a blatant double-standard, ask Howard to explain what happened to the "first missed shot" that he believes in and watch him stutter and drool.
Watch this, John. I won't stutter or drool, instead I'll offer a reasonable plausible explanation.
The missed shot probably hit concrete and might have fragmented making it even more difficult to find or recover.
Even if it didn't fragment, there's a huge difference in trying to recover a bullet that could have gone anywhere in or around Dealey Plaza after missing the limo compared to a bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat.
Of course a common sense distinction like that is lost on the drooling Kooks.
But I digress, this thread is about the droolers explaining what happened to the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat, not about what happened to the missed shot or the viability of the SBT.
So John, the ball is back in your court.
If you believe that JFK's throat wound was an entrance wound it's incumbent on you to offer a plausible explanation of what happened to that bullet if you want to be taken seriously and not dismissed as a drooling kook.
As I suspected it would, this thread is well on the way to becoming a debate about the SBT. That is not the purpose of this thread.
Nope, this thread was intended to give the drooling kooks an opportunity to explain where the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat went.
So far the droolers haven't been able to do that.
Until they can offer an explanation of where the bullet they insist entered JFK's throat went, they must be regarded as just a bunch of kooks by any reasonable person.
CHALLENGE STILL ON. STEP TO THE PLATE KOOKS.