The topic is the Magic Bullet if you didn't notice.
The topic of this thread is the "truly magical bullet"...the bullet that many CT's want to believe hit JFK in the throat, then somehow seems to have disappeared without a trace before it even made it all the way past the trachea. That's not the magic bullet you are looking for, stormtrooper. In any case, you brought up the SBT, which is only tangentially acquainted with the magic bullet (I should say the untruly magic bullet, just to avoid confusing you). The two ideas are wrongly conflated. Even if, arguendo, CE399 were some sort of plant, that wouldn't prevent JFK and JBC from being hit by the same projectile. It just wouldn't have been CE399.
About the other....Bugliosi seemed to buy the SBT, hook, line and sinker and you seem to also so... uhhhh....yeah I presumed. So what?
The epic rush to judgement of it says a lot about how you think, and you don't really seem to think a lot, judging from what I've seen from you so far.
What is this crap about Jackie Stewart?
It was a simile, used to demonstrate the complete pointlessness of your trying to impugn Baden's credentials as an FP with a pack of half-assed, beside-the-point accusations.
Someone doesn't stand up and agree so that means that they disagree?
Talk about 'presume'.
You don't read too well, do you? The HSCA FPP issued a report endorsing the SBT, among other things. While the report was written by Loquvam and Weston, it represented the opinion of the panel. The only dissenter was Cyril Wecht. In his dissent, Wecht noted that Spitz and Weston were pro-SBT, and then he noted that "'it was disclosed that subpanel I was in unanimous agreement with respect to the interpretation of the evidence." That is, everyone on subpanel I supported the SBT. All of them. Wecht helpfully notes that subpanel I was composed of all FPP members except himself, Weston, and Sptiz, the two guys he already labelled as SBTites. So, out of the whole FPP, Wecht was the only gut who didn't like the SBT.
As I said, Petty and Baden testified to the HSCA that they agreed with the SBT. Since Loquvam wrote the report, we know he supported it. And (again) Wecht named Spitz and Weston as SBT men. At a minimum, that's the SBT's 5 to your single Wecht. Not a very fair fight.
On the other hand, it's been 40 years since the report was issued. 40 years of opportunity for any of the FPP members to come out and say "I didn't agree with the SBT." None did.
Back to square one....
Provide a link where a forensic specialist/scientific/medical professional DISAGREES with Cyril Wecht on the SBT and proves where Dr Wecht is wrong regarding CE 399...or shut up about it.
Square one was a question about what happened to a hypothetical bullet that hit JFK in the throat with the upmost in hypothetical violence, and it was directed at CT's.
Square one in this particular exchange was your observation that the famously anti-SBT "Cyril Wecht is a foremost forensic pathologist." While your statement is technically true, it doesn't tell the whole story: Wecht is in a small (probably a very small) minority of FPs who have seen the evidence and think that the SBT is impossible.
I've already pointed you to where to find the information you demand. I guess you just don't want to find it, or even think about it.
As for the CE399 demand, it is Wecht who is making the specific claim (ie, that it couldn't do what they said it did, and come out looking like it does), and it is therefore his responsibility to prove his claim. By extension, it is up to anyone who champions Wecht's claim to prove it. That means you. Your petulant demands otherwise is nothing more than a half-assed attempt to shift the burden.