Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Matt Grantham]

They couldn't have planned to change the route before they changed the route?

[John Iacoletti]

Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #9.

To believe that a group of conspirators would entrust the biggest party headquarters break-in in American history to 5 two-bit "plumbers" sticking tape over a lock is too preposterous a notion for any rational person to harbor in his or her mind for more than a millisecond.

To believe that a group of conspirators would entrust the first biggest murder in American history to a disgruntled out of work actor who couldn't even read a compass is too preposterous a notion for any rational person to harbor in his or her mind for more than a millisecond.

etc, etc, etc

[John Iacoletti]

Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #8 - another strawman

Pretend you're a mindreader who knows what Oswald would have done, and then pretend that the story you fabricated (which of course is "common sense") somehow "precludes" the existence of a conspiracy.

[John Iacoletti]

Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #10 -- yet another strawman and more of Vince's mad mindreading skilz.

Name one conspiracy theorist in all of JFK-dom who has ever claimed that Oswald was "selected by a group of conspirators to get along with them".

[John Iacoletti]

What a pathetic argument to make. The Kennedy family allegedly supports the WC finding so those findings must be true?.. Wow!

What information did the Kennedys have (that we don't have) to even make that determination (if they ever truly did) to begin with?

[img width=60 height=60 ]https://emojipedia-us.s3.amazonaws.com/thumbs/120/emoji-one/104/thumbs-up-sign_1f44d.png[/img]

Fallacious Bugliosi Argument #12 - false appeal to authority

[John Iacoletti]

Bugliosi's arguments get more and more ridiculous as he goes along.  This is another version of his "I don't believe conspirators would do X, therefore there was no conspiracy".

First of all, just because Oswald was a cheapskate, it doesn't follow that he was poor.  Second of all, if a person really was an undercover agent, he wouldn't be undercover long if he was in the habit of going on spending sprees.  Third of all, we have a witness saying that Oswald came in to look at cars saying that within a few weeks he had some money coming in and would be back.

Yeah, I know.  He was another liar.  They were all liars.

[John Iacoletti]

I see one difference:  Caprio writes his own posts.  Mytton cuts and pastes Bugliosi.

[John Mytton]

Yeah, I know.  He was another liar.  They were all liars.

Yep, like all these inconvenient eyewitnesses and investigators;

Ruth Paine
Michael Paine
Marina Oswald
Davis sister 1
Davis sister 2
Mrs Brock
Benavides
Markham
Postal
Givens
Frazier
Warren
Greer
Holmes
Norman
Kirk
Cadigan
Truly
Brewer
Bledsoe
Brennan
Baker
Humes
Boswell
Callaway
Roberts
McDonald
Day
Fritz
And etc etc, basically everyone else connected with this case whose name wasn't Saint Lee Harvey Oswald, lied profusely.



JohnM